{"id":58176,"date":"2015-06-09T00:31:02","date_gmt":"2015-06-09T06:31:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=58176"},"modified":"2015-06-16T10:18:27","modified_gmt":"2015-06-16T16:18:27","slug":"session-deal-violated-spirit-of-sunshine-law-advocate-says","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2015\/06\/session-deal-violated-spirit-of-sunshine-law-advocate-says\/","title":{"rendered":"Session deal violated spirit of sunshine law, advocate says"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lawmakers were\u00a0celebrating quick passage of capital outlay and tax-incentive bills on Monday, but the head of a transparency group\u00a0said their actions violated at least the spirit of the state&#8217;s Open Meetings Act.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_56542\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 336px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-56542\" src=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-336x220.jpg\" alt=\"A statue of children outside the Roundhouse in Santa Fe.\" width=\"336\" height=\"220\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-336x220.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-768x502.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-771x504.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-1170x764.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Heath Haussamen \/ NMPolitics.net<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">A statue of children outside the Roundhouse in Santa Fe.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The deal lawmakers\u00a0and Gov. Susana Martinez\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2015\/06\/guv-legislative-leaders-reach-deal-on-special-session\/\" target=\"_blank\">announced Wednesday<\/a>\u00a0on\u00a0$295 million in capital outlay projects, the tax incentives, and supplemental funding for two state agencies coasted\u00a0to legislative approval <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesunion.com\/news\/article\/New-Mexico-special-session-eyes-fixing-capital-6314294.php\" target=\"_blank\">in a matter of hours<\/a> Monday afternoon.<\/p>\n<p>The bills didn&#8217;t appear online for the public to read until Monday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The manner in which the compromise was hammered out left no opportunity for public input,&#8221; said Susan Boe, executive director of the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government. &#8220;The whole process gave the appearance of government being conducted behind closed doors, which is never good government.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Other policymaking bodies in New Mexico probably wouldn&#8217;t have been allowed to make such a deal outside a public meeting.\u00a0If more than half of the members of a school board, for example, agreed to fund\u00a0projects behind closed doors, that act would violate\u00a0the state&#8217;s\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmag.gov\/uploads\/files\/Publications\/ComplianceGuides\/Open%20Meetings%20Act%20Compliance%20Guide%202015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Open Meetings Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But the situation with the\u00a0Legislature is murky, Boe said.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"module align-left half type-aside\">\n<h3>The details<\/h3>\n<p>Learn more about the bills lawmakers approved Monday and see how each senator and representative voted:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmlegis.gov\/lcs\/legislation.aspx?Chamber=S&amp;LegType=B&amp;LegNo=1&amp;year=15s\" target=\"_blank\">Capital outlay<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmlegis.gov\/lcs\/legislation.aspx?Chamber=H&amp;LegType=B&amp;LegNo=2&amp;year=15s\" target=\"_blank\">Tax incentives<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmlegis.gov\/lcs\/legislation.aspx?Chamber=H&amp;LegType=B&amp;LegNo=1&amp;year=15s\" target=\"_blank\">Supplemental agency funding<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/aside>\n<p>With the House and Senate each having dozens of members, whether a quorum in either chamber agreed to the deal before the session is difficult to determine, she said. Even if a majority of House or Senate members did agree to the deal, that might not have\u00a0violated the Open Meetings Act because\u00a0Democratic and Republican caucus meetings can\u00a0be kept\u00a0secret.<\/p>\n<p>Some said the secret negotiations were intended to save taxpayers money. A special session costs roughly $50,000 a day. FOG is &#8220;sympathetic&#8221; to the cost, Boe said, but dollars aren&#8217;t the only consideration.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The general policy behind the Open Meetings Act is that government business needs to be conducted in the sunshine, and we also want to provide the opportunity\u00a0for the public to have input,&#8221; she said. &#8220;That doesn&#8217;t seem to have occurred. At least the spirit of the Open Meetings Act, we didn&#8217;t seem to have compliance.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Others joined Boe in complaining\u00a0about a lack of sunshine in an article NMPolitics.net published <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2015\/06\/some-are-glad-for-session-deal-others-want-more-sunshine\/\" target=\"_blank\">before the session started<\/a>. And in discussions facilitated by NMPolitics.net, criticism\u00a0continued Monday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We do need a special session, but why the secrecy? I want my government to operate openly,&#8221;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/haussamen\/posts\/10100822143779561\" target=\"_blank\">Barbara Alvarez of Las Cruces<\/a>\u00a0wrote.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We must demand more sunshine from our elected officials,&#8221; wrote <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nmpolitics\/posts\/852816114754114\" target=\"_blank\">Harry Gordon of Rio Rancho<\/a>. &#8220;They need to remember who they work for and who has the power to fire them!&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Celebrating<\/h3>\n<p>Transparency aside, lawmakers, the governor, and many lobbying\u00a0groups were quick to applaud\u00a0bipartisanship that led to the deal and job creation they claimed would result. Martinez praised\u00a0the closed-door dealings\u00a0Boe criticized.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We worked really hard before we called a special session to come to agreements,&#8221; the Associated Press quoted Martinez, a Republican,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesunion.com\/news\/article\/New-Mexico-special-session-eyes-fixing-capital-6314294.php\" target=\"_blank\">as saying<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not saying we agreed all the time,&#8221; Martinez said, &#8220;&#8230; but we thought, at the end of the day, once I called a session, that we had agreements that were really, really good for New Mexicans.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Sarah Maestas-Barnes, R-Albuquerque, posted <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/photo.php?fbid=958048310883193\" target=\"_blank\">on Facebook<\/a> that she was &#8220;proud&#8221; of the job creation, public safety upgrades\u00a0and infrastructure improvements\u00a0that would result.\u00a0Sen. Michael Padilla, D-Albuquerque, called the passage of the capital outlay bill <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/michael.padilla.31\/posts\/10205514459035440\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;great news.&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Rep. Doreen Gallegos wrote <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/doreen.gallegos.9\/posts\/843389359041942\" target=\"_blank\">on Facebook<\/a> that she had been focused on\u00a0securing funding for projects in her district.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;At times compromise is difficult but when you look at doing good work for the people that sent you, politics needs to be set aside to complete the job,&#8221; the Las Cruces Democrat wrote.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking of tens of millions of dollars appropriated for\u00a0road improvements, Rep. Cathrynn Brown, R-Carlsbad, wrote <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cathrynn.brown\/posts\/900664689994928:0\" target=\"_blank\">on Facebook<\/a>, &#8220;Working together, we have achieved something good for our state!&#8221; Lt. Gov. John Sanchez, a Republican, said\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/LtGovSanchez\/status\/608038757430796288\" target=\"_blank\">on Twitter<\/a> that he was &#8220;Honored to preside over the Senate and proud of the work accomplished today.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Negotiations for a special session stemmed from lawmakers&#8217; failure to approve the capital outlay bill <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sfreporter.com\/santafe\/article-10117-legislature-ends-session-with-no-capital-outlay-bill.html\" target=\"_blank\">in the regular session<\/a>\u00a0earlier this year. The New Mexico Association of Commerce and Industry&#8217;s board chair, Dan Girand of Mack Energy, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmaci.org\/press-releases.aspx?b76c714536b44509a53b71c7946360ffblogPostId=fe9e7aa06e91468d87a91eab041a9527#BlogContent\" target=\"_blank\">said in a news release<\/a>\u00a0that would have resulted\u00a0in layoffs, so he was glad lawmakers approved capital outlay on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>And, Girand\u00a0said, it was &#8220;especially exciting that the tax package \u2014 which included proposals ACI helped create in response to the needs of New Mexico businesses \u2014 was not forgotten.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>John Hendry, president of the New Mexico Federation of Labor, called Monday &#8220;a good day for the good guys.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSenate and House members stayed laser focused on legislation that will put citizens to work, building and maintaining the commons,&#8221;\u00a0Hendry said in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nmfederationoflabor\/posts\/988039264549214\" target=\"_blank\">a news release<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Explaining<\/h3>\n<p>Meanwhile, with many New Mexicans uncertain about what exactly lawmakers approved, some\u00a0moved quickly to disseminate specifics. New Mexico In Depth posted\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/nmindepth.com\/2015\/06\/08\/check-out-2015-capital-outlay-projects-here\/\" target=\"_blank\">a searchable database<\/a> of all projects in the capital outlay bill and a graph showing funding <a href=\"http:\/\/nmindepth.com\/2015\/06\/08\/capital-outlay-bill-covers-all-the-new-mexico-bases\/\" target=\"_blank\">by county<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A handful of\u00a0Republican senators issued news releases detailing projects the capital outlay bill funded in their districts.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The passage of the capital outlay bill provides for projects that improve our citizens\u2019 safety and improves their quality of life,&#8221; Sen. Ron Griggs, R-Alamogordo, said in one of those news releases.<\/p>\n<p>Sen. Bill Burt, R-Alamogordo, said the capital outlay\u00a0bill &#8220;puts New Mexicans to work and provides needed infrastructure to the districts we represent.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Bill McCamley, D-Las Cruces, explained the tax breaks and detailed funding for his district in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bill.mccamley.3\/videos\/10153511005817189\" target=\"_blank\">a video<\/a>\u00a0he posted on Facebook.<\/p>\n<p>In response to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/haussamen\/posts\/10100822612495251\" target=\"_blank\">a question<\/a> NMPolitics.net posed on social media\u00a0about whether lawmakers had read the bills before voting, McCamley said he had read them and knew the details. He was the only lawmaker to respond by publication time.<\/p>\n<p><em>Disclosure: As NMPolitics.net has disclosed in the past, McCamley is the author&#8217;s friend. Read more about that and NMPolitics.net&#8217;s ethical guidelines\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/disclosures\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lawmakers were celebrating quick passage of capital outlay and tax-incentive bills on Monday, but the head of a transparency group said their actions violated at least the spirit of the state&#8217;s Open Meetings Act.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":56542,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[118,107,706],"class_list":["post-58176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-economy","tag-roundhouse","tag-transparency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58176\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/56542"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}