{"id":419,"date":"2006-07-31T16:46:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-31T22:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2006\/07\/city-says-lyons-campaign-signs-must-come-down\/"},"modified":"2006-07-31T16:46:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-31T22:46:00","slug":"city-says-lyons-campaign-signs-must-come-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2006\/07\/city-says-lyons-campaign-signs-must-come-down\/","title":{"rendered":"City says Lyons&#8217; campaign signs must come down"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a onblur=\"try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}\" href=\"http:\/\/photos1.blogger.com\/blogger\/5892\/2386\/1600\/0731.Lyons%27%20signs.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;\" src=\"http:\/\/photos1.blogger.com\/blogger\/5892\/2386\/400\/0731.Lyons%27%20signs.jpg\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a>Property owners in <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Las   Cruces<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> who put up campaign signs for Republican Land Commissioner Pat Lyons last week are in violation of an ordinance and will have to take them down, the city says.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">At issue is a city ordinance that prohibits the erecting of campaign signs until 90 days before an election. That would be Aug. 9 for the November general election. <st1:placename st=\"on\">Do\u00f1a<\/st1:placename> <st1:placename st=\"on\">Ana<\/st1:placename> <st1:placename st=\"on\">County<\/st1:placename>, <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:placename st=\"on\">Sunland<\/st1:placename> <st1:placetype st=\"on\">Park<\/st1:placetype><\/st1:place> and Hatch also allow signs 90 days before elections. Mesilla allows them 30 days before elections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Lyon\u2019s campaign put up two large signs on <st1:street st=\"on\"><st1:address st=\"on\">Roadrunner Parkway<\/st1:address><\/st1:street> and <st1:street st=\"on\"><st1:address st=\"on\">Telshor Boulevard<\/st1:address><\/st1:street> and several other signs at locations around <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Las Cruces<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> last week. The signs are on private property.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The signs were also put up in Ruidoso, despite a similar ordinance there.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:city st=\"on\">Lyons<\/st1:city><\/st1:place>\u2019 campaign will discuss the situation, said its campaign manager, Kristin Haase.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Hoyt Clifton with the secretary of state\u2019s office said no state law deals with campaign signs, but city ordinances do apply to private property, unless the ordinances specifically exempt private property.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Las Cruces<\/st1:place><\/st1:city>\u2019 ordinance provides no such exemption.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">City Manager Terrence Moore said the legal department researched the issue before concluding Monday that the signs must come down until Aug. 9.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u201cWe are simply proceeding with applicable code enforcement,\u201d <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Moore<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> said. \u201cIf they\u2019re not cooperative, we\u2019ll take the next step. \u2026 Hopefully, we\u2019ll have cooperation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">If property owners don\u2019t cooperate, <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Moore<\/st1:place><\/st1:City> said, the city can remove signs if they impede traffic, but will otherwise issue citations. The maximum fine is $500. <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Moore<\/st1:place><\/st1:City> said problems like this are rare and property owners are usually compliant.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Incumbent <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Lyons<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> faces Democrat Jim Baca in the November election. The race could be the closest of all statewide races this year.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">It\u2019s fair to note that there are a few small campaign signs that were never taken down after the primary election in <st1:city st=\"on\">Las  Cruces<\/st1:city>, including a sign for Baca near the <st1:place st=\"on\">East  Mesa<\/st1:place> campus of the Do\u00f1a Ana Community College of NMSU. Those signs also violate the city\u2019s ordinance.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><i style=\"\">A previous version of this posting incorrectly said the city would remove all campaign signs if property owners refused.<o:p><\/o:p><\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Property owners in Las Cruces who put up campaign signs for Republican Land Commissioner Pat Lyons last week are in violation of an ordinance and will have to take them down, the city says. At issue is a city ordinance that prohibits the erecting of campaign signs until 90 days before an election. That would [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-419","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=419"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/419\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}