{"id":4171,"date":"2009-01-26T07:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-26T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2009\/01\/richardson-has-long-been-good-to-his-friends\/"},"modified":"2009-01-26T07:00:00","modified_gmt":"2009-01-26T13:00:00","slug":"richardson-has-long-been-good-to-his-friends","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2009\/01\/richardson-has-long-been-good-to-his-friends\/","title":{"rendered":"Richardson has long been ‘good to his friends’"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5295498682594234786\"<\/a><\/p>\n

But does that mean he\u2019s engaging in pay-to-play politics? The governor\u2019s past statements and actions provide insight.<\/span><\/p>\n

Bill Richardson<\/a> admitted in his autobiography to giving a state job to a man because the man\u2019s father had helped him in a congressional campaign years earlier. And he told a journalist in 2007 that he remembers people who give him campaign contributions and thinks about ways to help them.<\/p>\n

Under our laws, there\u2019s not necessarily anything wrong with that. The system is set up to allow political appointments to taxpayer funded jobs. And, unless there\u2019s a quid pro quo<\/a>, there\u2019s not necessarily anything illegal about a politician using his clout to help a contributor.<\/p>\n

But such admissions from Richardson provide insight into how a man whose administration is currently dogged by pay-to-play allegations — a man who is arguably the most powerful politician in the state\u2019s history — plays the political game.<\/p>\n

Richardson is currently facing two separate pay-to-play controversies. The first involves a federal grand jury<\/a> investigating allegations that a California company received a state investment contract that paid almost $1.5 million in exchange for $110,000 in contributions to two Richardson political action committees and his 2006 gubernatorial re-election campaign. In the second case, a lawsuit alleges that the state lost $90 million in investment deals<\/a> made in exchange for a little more than $15,000 in contributions to Richardson\u2019s 2008 presidential campaign.<\/p>\n

Richardson\u2019s office declined a request for an interview for this article, but former House Minority Whip Dan Foley — also a contributor to this site — said in an interview that it\u2019s unfair to try to tie or compare the pay-to-play allegations to Richardson\u2019s decision to give a state job to the son of a man who helped him on a campaign.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think saying that a guy helped me on my campaign so I helped his son get a job — that\u2019s politics. That\u2019s different than saying that you give $250,000 and you get a big contract,\u201d Foley said. \u201cPolitics is a relationship business. You try to surround yourself with people you trust, you try to surround yourself with people you believe in, and who better than the people who were there in the beginning?\u201d<\/p>\n

But one New Mexico political operative, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, said Richardson\u2019s admissions should raise suspicion.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf he\u2019s willing to admit to giving a taxpayer-funded job as a political \u2018thank you,\u2019 and if he\u2019s willing to admit to thinking about how he can help people who give to his campaign, what is he doing that he\u2019s not admitting?\u201d the operative asked.<\/p>\n

A climate ripe for pay-to-play politics<\/span><\/p>\n

It was in a 2007 interview with CNBC<\/a> that Richardson said giving money to a politician does give the donor \u201ca little bit of an edge.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t give any extra access to somebody that contributes,\u201d Richardson said during that interview. \u201cBut I\u2019ll remember that person, and I\u2019ll say, \u2018Jeez, that guy helped me. Maybe I can help them.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

And it was in his 2005 autobiography, \u201cBetween Words: The Making of an American Life,\u201d<\/a> that Richardson recounted giving a state job to the son of Donaldo \u201cTiny\u201d Martinez, an influential Hispanic activist in northern New Mexico whose support of Richardson\u2019s 1980 run for the 1st Congressional District seat gave his campaign a big boost. Richardson ended up losing to an incumbent Republican by about 1,000 votes that year, but two years later he won the newly created 3rd District seat.<\/p>\n

\u201cMore than two decades later, Martinez\u2019s son applied for a state job,\u201d Richardson wrote in his book. \u201cI talked to him and he told me his credentials. He was as qualified as the other candidates. I told him he was getting the job because he was his father\u2019s son and because his father did a fine thing for me many years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n

Many politicos who declined to speak on the record for this article pointed to stories like that, and the volume of news articles throughout Richardson\u2019s tenure about campaign contributors getting state contracts or appointments to boards and commissions, as evidence that Richardson has engaged for years in pay-to-play politics. It\u2019s Richardson\u2019s behind-the-scenes political maneuverings, the anonymous political operative quoted previously in this article said, that keep many from being willing to speak for the record about it.<\/p>\n

\u201cEverybody knows that Bill Richardson is good to his friends,\u201d the operative said. \u201cAnd on the flip side, everybody knows that he can be very vindictive if you cross him. Examine his line-item vetoes for Democrat legislators versus Republicans<\/a>, and it becomes obvious. So the reason no one is willing to go on the record about many of these allegations, even though many are probably true, is he\u2019s still a very powerful person and is willing to use that power to hurt people if they speak ill of him.\u201d<\/p>\n

Jose Z. Garcia, a New Mexico State University government professor and active Democrat, wrote in a recent column published on this site<\/a> that the combination of Richardson\u2019s \u201cbullying style\u201d and the fact that he \u201celevated fundraising to an art form\u201d and raised unprecedented amounts of money in New Mexico created a climate ripe for pay-to-play politics.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere were fundraisers in-state, out-of-state, big ones, little ones, fat ones, skinny ones. And people doing business or wanting to do business with the state were at least as encouraged to contribute as anyone else, and probably more,\u201d wrote Garcia, a Richardson appointee to the New Mexico Border Authority until his term expired in 2006. \u201c\u2026 Fundraisers received appointments to powerful positions on boards and commissions and in other ways appeared to receive a great deal of face time with Big Bill.\u201d<\/p>\n

The examples are many<\/span><\/p>\n

In addition to the allegations at the center of the federal probe and the lawsuit, the examples of campaign contributors winning state contracts are many:<\/p>\n

\u2022 The bank Northern Trust has handled billions of dollars in state assets<\/a> since being hired in 2003. Meanwhile, the company and its executives have given more than $45,000 to Richardson\u2019s campaigns and PACs.<\/p>\n

\u2022 A Los Angeles-based public relations firm won a $140,000 annual state contract<\/a> in 2006, and in 2007 its employees contributed almost $10,000 to Richardson\u2019s presidential campaign.<\/p>\n

\u2022 Paul Blanchard, the president of the Downs at Albuquerque, served as finance chairman on Richardson\u2019s 2006 re-election campaign, and he and his wife have donated $300,000 to Richardson\u2019s gubernatorial campaigns, according to the New York Times<\/a>. Meanwhile, Blanchard does a lot of business with the state, including the approval in May by the State Racing Commission, whose board members are appointed by Richardson, of what the Times called \u201ca controversial request from Mr. Blanchard to move the racetrack off the fairgrounds to the city of Moriarty and expand its casino operation.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2022 A California developer gave $75,000 to Richardson\u2019s 2006 re-election campaign and donated use of his personal jet to the governor. Meanwhile, Richardson helped secure approval of state funding totaling $4 million for an interchange on Interstate 25<\/a> in Belen that is going to vastly improve access to the developer\u2019s 6,000-acre development.<\/p>\n

\u2022 ValueOptions won a lucrative state contract in 2005 to manage mental-health and substance-abuse services for the state. People tied to the company donated at least $25,000 to Richardson campaigns, and the chairman of the company held a fundraiser for Richardson\u2019s presidential campaign. However, ValueOptions lost the state contract last month to another company. People tied to the new holder of that contract also gave big to Richardson campaigns.<\/p>\n

\u2022 Santa Fe art dealer and developer Gerald Peters contributed well over $100,000 to the governor\u2019s campaigns, let Richardson use his jet for political trips and held a fundraiser for his presidential campaign. Meanwhile, Richardson made Peters a vice chair of his task force on higher education in 2004. In addition, in 2006 Peters was awarded a contract to rebuild the state Department of Transportation headquarters in Santa Fe in exchange for the right to use the remainder of the DOT property to develop commercial and residential buildings for his own profit. The project was terminated amid controversy<\/a> surrounding how Peters won the contract and the project\u2019s ties to defendants in the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Courthouse scandal.<\/p>\n

\u2018Let this investigation run its course\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n

Richardson has repeatedly insisted that there\u2019s no connection between donations and contracts, despite what he told CNBC about his tendency to consider how he can help campaign contributors.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s no connection between donations and what happens in state government,\u201d Richardson said at a 2007 news conference<\/a> related to the DOT controversy. \u201cThat\u2019s always been an established principle.\u201d<\/p>\n

Foley acknowledged that some of Richardson\u2019s actions are questionable, but said it\u2019s not clear that Richardson or any member of his staff has done anything illegal. In addition to being a former legislator who wielded quite a bit of influence, Foley is an insurance agent who gets a 10 percent commission on all policies sold under Allstate\u2019s contract to provide supplemental insurance to state employees. He said he has never experienced Richardson be threatening or bullying and said the governor has \u201cnever asked me for a penny.\u201d<\/p>\n

Foley said he\u2019s confident that the federal probe will determine whether there was any impropriety.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou give us a check and you get the contract — If that was said, it\u2019ll come out and they should get in trouble. That\u2019s wrong. That\u2019s entirely wrong; there\u2019s no way around it,\u201d Foley said. \u201c\u2026 (But) I think the people of New Mexico should sit back and let this investigation run its course.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

But does that mean he\u2019s engaging in pay-to-play politics? The governor\u2019s past statements and actions provide insight. Bill Richardson admitted in his autobiography to giving a state job to a man because the man\u2019s father had helped him in a congressional campaign years earlier. And he told a journalist in 2007 that he remembers people […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4171"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4171\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}