{"id":409027,"date":"2017-08-24T06:57:50","date_gmt":"2017-08-24T12:57:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=409027"},"modified":"2017-08-25T07:12:53","modified_gmt":"2017-08-25T13:12:53","slug":"how-much-secrecy-does-spaceport-america-need","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2017\/08\/how-much-secrecy-does-spaceport-america-need\/","title":{"rendered":"How much secrecy does Spaceport America need?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_410886\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignnone\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-410886\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/05042017-VirginGalacticInterviews-5-771x519.jpg\" alt=\"Jonathan Firth\" width=\"771\" height=\"519\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/05042017-VirginGalacticInterviews-5-771x519.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/05042017-VirginGalacticInterviews-5-336x226.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/05042017-VirginGalacticInterviews-5-768x517.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/05042017-VirginGalacticInterviews-5-1170x787.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/05042017-VirginGalacticInterviews-5.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Josh Bachman \/ Las Cruces Sun-News<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Jonathan Firth, Virgin Galactic\u2019s executive vice president for spaceport and program development, said the company needs some secrecy, especially for things like estimated flight schedules and technology development. But his response made clear that not all companies are demanding the level of secrecy that Spaceport America officials want in New Mexico.<\/p><\/div>\n<h4><em>The spaceport wants the ability to keep all sorts of information secret and is already shielding most\u00a0companies&#8217; rent payments\u00a0from the public<\/em><\/h4>\n<p>You don\u2019t have a right to know how much money companies that do business at Spaceport America pay to use the publicly owned facility, officials there say.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the spaceport wants the ability to keep all sorts of information secret, including the identities of commercial space companies doing business there.<\/p>\n<p>The growing commercial space industry is hypercompetitive. Publicly releasing rent payments, lease agreements and other information harms the spaceport\u2019s efforts to recruit companies, N.M. Spaceport Authority CEO Dan Hicks says \u2013 and that makes it more challenging to grow the spaceport and build a stronger economy in southern New Mexico.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"module align-left half type-aside\">\n<h3>About this series<\/h3>\n<p>This article is part of <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/series\/spaceport-america\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">an NMPolitics.net series<\/a> examining Spaceport America\u2019s impact on New Mexico\u2019s economy and future. A decade ago, the state and voters in Do\u00f1a Ana and Sierra counties approved public funding to build the facility on the promise of Virgin Galactic flying paying customers into space from southern New Mexico and elected officials pledging thousands of new jobs in the tech and tourism sectors. We spent months investigating where things stand today.<\/p>\n<h3>Read the rest of the series<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2017\/08\/is-spaceport-america-taking-flight\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Is Spaceport America taking flight?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2017\/08\/funding-woes-could-cripple-nm-spaceport-as-other-states-invest-in-space-race\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Funding woes could \u2018cripple\u2019 NM spaceport as other states invest in space race<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2017\/08\/transparency-problems-plague-spaceport-america\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Transparency problems plague Spaceport America<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2017\/08\/after-years-of-delays-virgin-galactic-prepares-for-spaceflights-from-nm\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">After years of delays, Virgin Galactic prepares for spaceflights from NM<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/aside>\n<p>\u201cIf you were to ask them would they want their leases out in the public they would say no,\u201d Hicks said. \u201c\u2026We just don\u2019t want to have additional burdens on them or scrutiny on them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s a controversial stance in a poor state that has invested more than $220 million in Spaceport America \u2013 a state whose law intends that the public be given access to \u201cthe greatest possible information regarding the affairs of government,\u201d which it calls \u201can essential function of a representative government.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s a real tension created by the public\/private partnership that is the spaceport. On one hand, greater secrecy may help attract companies that demand it, and with them may come good-paying jobs the state needs. On the other hand is the principle that opening the spaceport\u2019s finances builds accountability and public trust that is key to winning the government funding on which the spaceport also depends.<\/p>\n<p>Senate President Pro Tem Mary Kay Papen, D-Las Cruces, sponsored <a href=\"https:\/\/nmlegis.gov\/Legislation\/Legislation?chamber=S&amp;legType=B&amp;legNo=429&amp;year=17\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">legislation<\/a> on behalf of the spaceport earlier this year that would have let the agency keep rent payments, trade secrets and other information secret. One committee approved the bill, but then it died.<\/p>\n<p>These days Papen says she supports withholding company trade secrets from the public. But she no longer backs secrecy for money coming into the spaceport from private companies.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf our Do\u00f1a Ana County taxes are going for the upkeep and support for the spaceport, then I think how much private money we\u2019re collecting certainly is within the realm of what the public should be able to know,\u201d Papen said.<\/p>\n<h3>Leases released, but info blacked out<\/h3>\n<p>Though the agency\u00a0unsuccessfully sought legislation earlier this year to protect rent payments from public disclosure, the spaceport now claims it already has that right. In response to a formal request under the state\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmag.gov\/uploads\/files\/Publications\/ComplianceGuides\/Inspection%20of%20Public%20Records%20Compliance%20Guide%202015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Inspection of Public Records Act<\/a> (IPRA) from NMPolitics.net, the Spaceport Authority released lease agreements with five commercial space companies \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Executed-VG-Lease.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Virgin Galactic<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/SpaceX_Redacted.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">SpaceX<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Up-Agreement-Redacted.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">UP Aerospace<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Exos-agreement-redacted.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">EXOS Aerospace<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Energeticx-Lease-IPRA-REDACTED.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">EnergeticX<\/a> \u2013 but blacked out rent payment and other information in four of those leases.<\/p>\n<p>As part of our months-long investigation of the spaceport, NMPolitics.net also requested all supporting documentation for <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Spaceport-America-Economic-Impact-09-21-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">a slideshow presentation<\/a> that claims the spaceport generated $20 in economic activity for every $1 the state spent in fiscal year 2016. That should have included rent payments from private companies and other money that came into the spaceport\u2019s bank accounts. There are no documents, the agency asserted.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"module align-left half type-aside\">\n<h3>View the leases<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Executed-VG-Lease.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Virgin Galactic<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/SpaceX_Redacted.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">SpaceX<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Up-Agreement-Redacted.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">UP Aerospace<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Exos-agreement-redacted.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">EXOS Aerospace<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Energeticx-Lease-IPRA-REDACTED.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">EnergeticX<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/aside>\n<p>NMPolitics.net\u2019s aim in seeking the financial information was to share data that would help the public analyze the success of the decade-old project, which was intended to create new jobs and spark tourism.<\/p>\n<p>So what did NMPolitics.net learn about the income the spaceport is earning from the five commercial space companies? Nothing the public didn\u2019t already know. The slideshow highlighting the spaceport\u2019s economic impact claims \u2013 the presentation the spaceport says has no supporting documents \u2013 states that Virgin Galactic\u2019s direct spending in Fiscal Year 2016 was $3.3 million, and other companies combined to spend $1.3 million. But we weren\u2019t given documents that would verify those numbers or provide details.<\/p>\n<p>A previous Spaceport Authority administration released Virgin Galactic\u2019s lease agreement to the public, so there was no point in redacting it in response to NMPolitics.net\u2019s request, Hicks said. The 20-year lease with the spaceport\u2019s \u201canchor\u201d tenant shows what the public already knew: Virgin Galactic has been paying $1 million per year in rent for the first five years. There\u2019s a formula in the lease agreement to calculate rent for the remaining 15 years, which officials say amounts to about $3 million per year starting in 2018. Additional fees are built into the lease as well.<\/p>\n<p>NMPolitics.net didn\u2019t get more information from the state agency responsible for complying with records requests \u2013 but Jonathan Firth, Virgin Galactic\u2019s executive vice president for spaceport and program development, told NMPolitics.net the company has paid just over $7.1 million in rent and fees to the spaceport.<\/p>\n<p>What about the other companies? The spaceport\u2019s current administration is shielding how much they pay in rent and fees from the public.<\/p>\n<p>Other information that was redacted in some or all of the leases with SpaceX, Up Aerospace, EXOS Aerospace and EnergeticX included sections that indicate where at Spaceport America companies are operating, insurance information \u2013 and, in the SpaceX lease, even the contact information for two company officials.<\/p>\n<p>Spaceport America hasn\u2019t always been so secretive. In addition to releasing Virgin Galactic\u2019s lease without redactions before Hicks was in charge, the agency has also shared details about its agreement with SpaceX. Hicks\u2019 predecessor, Christine Anderson, was quoted in 2013 as saying SpaceX would be paying $6,600 a month for three years to lease a mobile mission control facility and $25,000 per launch to test <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Grasshopper_(rocket)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">a reusable rocket<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, today the spaceport is trying to keep secret information it released to the public four years ago that\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usnews.com\/science\/news\/articles\/2013\/05\/07\/elon-musks-spacex-signs-lease-at-nm-spaceport?offset=60\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">still available online<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t<div id=\"slides-409027-6a4b4c1cc8975ed2952288e3ed71d571\" class=\"navis-slideshow\"><div id=\"409027-6a4b4c1cc8975ed2952288e3ed71d571-slide1\"><img data-lazy=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/8.16.17-Lease-redaction-1.jpg\" \/><h6 class=\"credit\">Screenshot<\/h6><h6 class=\"permalink\"><a href=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2017\/08\/how-much-secrecy-does-spaceport-america-need\/#409027-6a4b4c1cc8975ed2952288e3ed71d571\/1\" class=\"slide-permalink\"><i class=\"icon-link\"><\/i> permalink<\/a><\/h6><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">The N.M. Spaceport Authority blacked out rent and fee information in four lease agreements with aerospace companies before providing the documents to NMPolitics.net, including this lease with UP Aerospace.<\/p><\/div><div id=\"409027-6a4b4c1cc8975ed2952288e3ed71d571-slide2\"><img data-lazy=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/8.16.17-Lease-redaction-2.jpg\" \/><h6 class=\"credit\">Screenshot<\/h6><h6 class=\"permalink\"><a href=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2017\/08\/how-much-secrecy-does-spaceport-america-need\/#409027-6a4b4c1cc8975ed2952288e3ed71d571\/2\" class=\"slide-permalink\"><i class=\"icon-link\"><\/i> permalink<\/a><\/h6><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">The redactions the N.M. Spaceport Authority made before providing four lease agreements to NMPolitics.net were so extensive that they even included, in the SpaceX lease shown here, contact information for two company officials.<\/p><\/div><\/div>\n<h3>Are the redactions legal?<\/h3>\n<p>To justify redacting portions of the lease agreements, the Spaceport Authority\u2019s general counsel, Melissa Kemper Force, cited the provision in IPRA that allows withholding information \u201cas otherwise provided by law,\u201d then pointed to a <a href=\"http:\/\/swrtc.nmsu.edu\/files\/2014\/12\/New-Mexico-Rules-of-Evidence.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">New Mexico Supreme Court rule of evidence<\/a> that states, \u201ca person or entity owning a trade secret has a privilege to refuse to disclose, or to prevent others from disclosing, the trade secret.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But do evidence rules for the judicial branch apply to an executive branch agency\u2019s response to a records request? The rules state that they \u201cgovern proceedings in the courts of the State of New Mexico.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Peter St. Cyr, executive director of the N.M. Foundation for Open Government, took issue with the redactions. The Spaceport Authority, after unsuccessfully seeking legislative approval to withhold certain information, is now acting as if the Legislature gave its approval, St. Cyr charged. He said the agency can\u2019t \u201cstubbornly withhold information on their own whim\u201d and urged the release of all information NMPolitics.net has requested.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey need to stop imposing their own secrecy rules and rely on the Legislature to determine what can be put in a bottom desk drawer under lock and key,\u201d St. Cyr said.<\/p>\n<p>Whether state law protects, or should protect, spaceport trade secrets isn\u2019t the only question. The other is what constitutes a trade secret. Does it include rent payments?<\/p>\n<p>Force cited the state\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/tsi.brooklaw.edu\/cases\/location\/new-mexico\/statute\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Uniform Trade Secrets Act<\/a>. It defines such secrets as \u201cinformation, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process\u201d that \u201cderives independent economic value\u201d from being secret and \u201cis the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That law doesn\u2019t mention rent payments. Papen said such payments \u201ccertainly shouldn\u2019t be a trade secret.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sen. George Mu\u00f1oz, D-Gallup, agreed. \u201cThere should be nothing secret about the income of the spaceport. It\u2019s publicly financed,\u201d he said. \u201cTrade secrets I agree with \u2013 operations, negotiations shouldn\u2019t be public \u2013 but lease agreements, once they\u2019re signed, they\u2019re public record.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lt. Gov. John Sanchez, a non-voting member of the spaceport\u2019s governing board and chair of the national Aerospace States Association, also said rent payments should be public.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKnowledge of the income the spaceport brings in is vital for the public to assess progress and viability,\u201d the Republican said. \u201cWhile many elements of the development of aerospace technology are proprietary, the financial viability of Spaceport America is the business of every New Mexican.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>No New Mexico officials interviewed for this article, other than spaceport employees, said the spaceport should be able to keep rent payments secret.<\/p>\n<p>In at least two other states, officials believe they are allowed such secrecy. The state agency that runs Florida\u2019s commercial space program can withhold rent information \u201cif there\u2019s a compelling reason,\u201d asserted Dale Ketcham, Space Florida\u2019s chief of strategic alliances. In some instances, Ketcham said, space companies don\u2019t want competitors to know what they\u2019re doing, and the amount of rent payments might provide clues.<\/p>\n<p>But Barbara Petersen, president of the Florida\u00a0First Amendment Foundation, doesn\u2019t believe that state\u2019s law protecting trade secrets applies to rent payments. \u201cAny assertion that such information should be protected would undoubtedly be challenged in court,\u201d Petersen said.<\/p>\n<p>Virginia law allows secrecy surrounding space company trade secrets and information \u201crelating to rate structures\u201d if disclosure would \u201cadversely affect the financial interest or bargaining position of the state agency.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Megan Rhyne with the Virginia Coalition for Open Government said SpaceX \u201cessentially said they wouldn\u2019t come to\u00a0Virginia\u00a0without the exemption.\u201d Rhyne said she isn\u2019t sure the law in Virginia, home to the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport, protects rent payments from public disclosure. But, she said, there\u2019s \u201ccertainly an argument for it.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>\u2018It\u2019s not all or nothing\u2019<\/h3>\n<p>Because Hicks asserted that commercial space companies want such secrecy, NMPolitics.net asked New Mexico\u2019s most high-profile space company, Virgin Galactic, to weigh in. Firth said the company needs some secrecy, especially for things like estimated flight schedules and technology development. But his response made clear that not all companies are demanding the level of secrecy SpaceX sought in Virginia.<\/p>\n<p>Papen\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/nmlegis.gov\/Legislation\/Legislation?chamber=S&amp;legType=B&amp;legNo=429&amp;year=17\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">legislation<\/a> would have allowed the spaceport to keep secret customer information including identity, correspondence, schedules, agreements, payments, activities, technology, visitor logs and policies. Virgin Galactic took no position on the legislation, Firth said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s not all or nothing,\u201d he said. \u201cThere are some categories I\u2019m sure would be more concerning than others.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>When asked whether Virgin Galactic would prefer to keep its rent payments secret, Firth didn\u2019t directly answer. But he did share that the company has paid just over $7.1 million in rent and fees to the spaceport.<\/p>\n<p>Still, Firth said he understood Spaceport America\u2019s challenge when other states \u201ccan say to these customers, you don\u2019t have to worry, you don\u2019t have to release this information.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI can see their point,\u201d Firth said. \u201cBut I don\u2019t think that everything about everything needs to fall under that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The tension has Rep. Bill McCamley, D-Las Cruces, uncertain about what spaceport information should be available to the public in New Mexico. McCamley has been working for a decade on Spaceport America issues, both as a county commissioner and state lawmaker.<\/p>\n<p>Because the spaceport is publicly funded, McCamley said he wants as much information as possible to be \u201cknown and public.\u201d At the same time, he said, \u201ccompanies value privacy so greatly that I do think we have to be careful, especially with things like research and trade secrets, that we protect their ability to experiment and not give away what they&#8217;re doing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ketcham, the Space Florida official, said competition among commercial space companies is stiff. Secrecy allows the market to become even more cutthroat, he said \u2013 which will spur innovation and ultimately reduce the cost of human space travel. \u201cAnd humanity is going to be well-served,\u201d Ketcham said.<\/p>\n<p>The redactions in the lease agreements the Spaceport Authority provided to NMPolitics.net were \u201cdesigned to honor the rights that New Mexican state law provides to innovators, developers and entrepreneurs who seek to move their operations to our state and, hopefully, create jobs, boost the economy and help us become a leader in the space industry,\u201d said Force, the agency\u2019s attorney.<\/p>\n<p>Papen, on the other hand, said the spaceport should release rent payment information if it wants the public to trust the project. She doesn\u2019t plan to sponsor any legislation in the future to make rent payments secret.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think if they want to bring back the legislation\u2026 they\u2019re going to have to revise that request that they have and make it so that it is tenable for everybody,\u201d Papen said.<\/p>\n<p>Hicks said the spaceport will continue to seek legislation to allow greater secrecy, including the protection of rent payments from public disclosure.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf the industry didn\u2019t need it then I wouldn\u2019t push for it,\u201d Hicks said. \u201cThere\u2019s other companies out there that would not come and will not come unless we have the same protections that Virginia gives them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI want to level the playing field and make their decision to come to New Mexico an easy, no-brainer decision,\u201d Hicks said. \u201cThat\u2019s my goal.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The spaceport wants the ability to keep all sorts of information secret and is already shielding most companies&#8217; rent payments from the public.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":410886,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[193,107,141,706],"class_list":["post-409027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-corporate-america","tag-roundhouse","tag-spaceport-america","tag-transparency","series-spaceport-america"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/409027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=409027"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/409027\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/410886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=409027"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=409027"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=409027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}