{"id":40159,"date":"2012-05-22T10:51:33","date_gmt":"2012-05-22T16:51:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=40159"},"modified":"2012-05-22T10:57:04","modified_gmt":"2012-05-22T16:57:04","slug":"sunland-attorney-says-hiring-followed-bidding-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2012\/05\/sunland-attorney-says-hiring-followed-bidding-process\/","title":{"rendered":"Sunland attorney says hiring followed bidding process"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_37313\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignnone\" style=\"max-width: 600px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-37313\" title=\"Sunland City Hall\" src=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Sunland-City-Hall.jpg\" alt=\"Sunland Park City Hall (Photo by Heath Haussamen)\" width=\"600\" height=\"348\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Sunland-City-Hall.jpg 600w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Sunland-City-Hall-336x195.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Sunland-City-Hall-300x174.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Heath Haussamen \/ NMPolitics.net<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sunland Park City Hall (Photo by Heath Haussamen)<\/p><\/div>\n<h4>The state auditor recently accused Sunland Park of violating the Procurement Code by entering into a no-bid contract for legal services, but the city\u2019s attorney says that isn\u2019t true \u2013 and provided documents to back up his claim.<\/h4>\n<div style=\"margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 2px; float: right; width: 270px; border: 1px solid; padding: 12px; background-color: #ebebea;\" align=\"right\">\n<div style=\"font-weight: bold; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 8px;\" align=\"center\">The documents<\/div>\n<div align=\"left\">You can view the documents Frank Coppler provided, including the request for proposals and his bid for the city\u2019s legal services contract, by clicking <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/Documents\/SunlandAttorneyRFPDocs.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The recently released special audit of Sunland Park accuses the city of violating the state Procurement Code by failing to seek bids when it entered into a contract with Santa Fe attorney Frank Coppler for legal services.<\/p>\n<p>But Coppler says the city did seek bids \u2013 and he provided the request for proposals and his firm\u2019s bid to back up his claim.<\/p>\n<p>Coppler has long been the city\u2019s attorney. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.saonm.org\/media\/audits\/6169_City_of_Sunland_Park_Special_Audit_May_14_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">The audit<\/a> notes that the council opted to continue Coppler\u2019s contract on Jan. 30, 2009, according to minutes of the city council meeting.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCoppler functioned as an independent contractor, but the City never procured his services through a formal bid process,\u201d the audit states. \u201cThe City paid Coppler a total of $481,378.86 in legal fees, from general and restricted funds, during fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A bidding process that complied with the state\u2019s Procurement Code and the city\u2019s purchasing regulations was required for such a large contract, the audit states.<\/p>\n<p>In an e-mail, Coppler told NMPolitics.net that State Auditor Hector Balderas \u201cdoes not have all the facts.\u201d While the city may no longer possess documents showing there was a competitive bidding process \u2013 even though it\u2019s required by law to maintain them \u2013 Coppler provided documents. You can read them <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/Documents\/SunlandAttorneyRFPDocs.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>You\u2019ll see a request for proposals at that link. It states that proposals were due by Jan. 19, 2009, but the date the RFP was issued isn\u2019t clear. You\u2019ll also see Coppler\u2019s proposal, which is dated Jan. 8.<\/p>\n<p>Coppler also sent a copy of the agreement between his firm and the city, along with an e-mail indicating that his office sent the proposed professional services agreement to the city on Jan. 27 \u2013 three days before the council voted to finalize the agreement.<\/p>\n<p>Coppler also sent a copy of another request for proposals issued March 1, 2010. He told NMPolitics.net that, even though the 2009 agreement is good until 2013, \u201cat that time we understood they may wish to reconsider a full-time city attorney or a different contract attorney. But the city did not act on that suggestion,\u201d so the 2009 agreement between the city and Coppler remains in effect.<\/p>\n<p>Not included in the documents Coppler sent NMPolitics.net are any that indicate if others submitted proposals in 2009 or 2010, scoring sheets ranking bidders, or advertisements indicating how widespread the requests for proposals were distributed. Those aren\u2019t documents Coppler would necessarily have in his possession, even as city attorney. They were required to be maintained by the city.<\/p>\n<p>Coppler ended his e-mail with this statement about the recent change in governance in Sunland Park:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis March, we informed the city of all of the pending files that we are handling and their status and pointed out that since the March elections have caused a change in administration, notwithstanding our contract running for another year, the city is free to choose other counsel. The city has not responded to our invitation to\u00a0secure other counsel and we have a statutory responsibility to continue our services until the city selects a successor.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Coppler indicated that he has also provided the documents to the district attorney, who is investigating.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The state auditor recently accused Sunland Park of violating the Procurement Code by entering into a no-bid contract for legal services, but the city\u2019s attorney says that isn\u2019t true \u2013 and provided documents to back up his claim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[167],"class_list":["post-40159","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-sunland-park"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40159"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40159\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}