{"id":33266,"date":"2011-10-26T03:13:17","date_gmt":"2011-10-26T09:13:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=33266"},"modified":"2011-10-27T09:20:49","modified_gmt":"2011-10-27T15:20:49","slug":"rivals-must-focus-on-why-the-mayor-needs-to-go","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2011\/10\/rivals-must-focus-on-why-the-mayor-needs-to-go\/","title":{"rendered":"Rivals must focus on why the mayor needs to go"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_33267\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignnone\" style=\"max-width: 600px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-33267\" title=\"Mayoral candidates\" src=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/Mayoral-candidates.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"314\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/Mayoral-candidates.jpg 600w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/Mayoral-candidates-336x176.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/Mayoral-candidates-300x157.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">From left, Las Cruces mayoral candidates Dolores Connor, Michael Ray Huerta and Ken Miyagishima going over the ground rules for Tuesday\u2019s debate with Las Cruces Sun-News editor Jim Lawitz before it started. (Photo by Heath Haussamen)<\/p><\/div>\n<h4>Michael Ray Huerta and Dolores Connor outperformed incumbent Las Cruces Mayor Ken Miyagishima at Tuesday\u2019s debate, but they didn\u2019t spend enough time rebutting his argument for why he deserves to be re-elected<\/h4>\n<p>One of the most interesting moments during Tuesday\u2019s Las Cruces mayoral candidate debate came when <a href=\"http:\/\/michaelrayhuerta.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Michael Ray Huerta<\/a> took a pointed shot at the progressive movement that has been such a force in recent elections.<\/p>\n<p>In response to me asking why he stopped calling himself a progressive when he entered this mayoral race (I was on the panel asking the questions), Huerta said this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cProgressive to me meant that you care more about the middle class than you do about recycling, that you care more about people living in poverty than you do about bike paths. That\u2019s not the case with a lot of people in Las Cruces. What I quickly found out is there\u2019s a paradigm in Las Cruces because of some local politics that says progressives care more about theirself and their own lifestyle then they do about anything else.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s not the type of Democrat that I am. I\u2019m a Democrat who cares about the middle class. I\u2019m a Democrat who cares about people living in poverty. And I\u2019m a Democrat who believes that the No. 1 thing that we need to do in this city, in this state, and in this country, is to put people back to work.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Huerta\u2019s criticism of the local progressive movement elicited a strong reaction from two panelists running <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2011\/10\/watch-the-cruces-mayoral-debate-join-the-liveblog\/\" target=\"_blank\">NMPolitics.net\u2019s liveblog of the debate<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/MayoralCandidates4.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"MayoralCandidates\" width=\"270\" height=\"226\" class=\"alignright size-full\" \/><\/p>\n<p>\u201cWow! Michael shows some guts taking on progressives,\u201d Do\u00f1a Ana County Commissioner Scott Krahling wrote on the liveblog.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHuerta is losing any vote from politically active groups,\u201d former Commissioner Bill McCamley responded. \u201cThis is either very good for him, or every harmful.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>Does Huerta have a base?<\/h3>\n<p>The so-called progressive movement has been the driving force in local politics for years. During elections in 2007, 2008 and 2009, progressives <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2009\/11\/voters-give-progressives-a-mandate-in-las-cruces\/\" target=\"_blank\">took control<\/a> of city government in Las Cruces by electing <a href=\"http:\/\/mayorken.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Ken Miyagishima<\/a> to be mayor and taking over the city council. This year\u2019s election is the first test of what voters think about those progressive-backed candidates who are now incumbents.<\/p>\n<p>Huerta is a Democrat (though also a former Republican) who is trying to unseat another Democrat. On Tuesday, Huerta essentially slammed the door in the face of the most active group of Democrats in the last two city elections.<\/p>\n<p>That raises an interesting question: Does Huerta have a base? Through much of Tuesday\u2019s debate, he sounded like the most fiscally conservative candidate even though Miyagishima\u2019s other challenger, District 2 Councilor <a href=\"http:\/\/doloresconnorformayor.wordpress.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dolores Connor<\/a>, is the Republican in the race.<\/p>\n<p>Connor has won the endorsement of the realtor\u2019s association. It\u2019s safe to say Huerta is not likely to get the backing of many business groups in town.<\/p>\n<p>But he thumbed his nose on Tuesday at progressives, the other major force in city politics. So this is the question I\u2019ve been wondering since Huerta entered the race: Will he draw enough support to be a factor? If so, from where?<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ve not seen any polls. So the short answer is that there is no clear answer. But Huerta is betting his campaign on anti-incumbent sentiment.<\/p>\n<h3>Huerta puts Connor in Miyagishima\u2019s camp<\/h3>\n<p>Huerta is an articulate communicator and has the ability to run circles around Connor and Miyagishima in debates and forums. Still, the other two held their own on Tuesday. In fact, Connor did better than that. In an entirely unscientific poll on the NMPolitics.net liveblog, 57 percent said Connor won the debate, while 36 percent picked Huerta and 7 percent picked Miyagishima.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Connor started out a bit shaky but, in the second half of the debate, she got fed up with Huerta\u2019s attacks and really took him on. Her most passionate statement of the night followed Huerta\u2019s criticism of Las Cruces progressives and an ensuing discussion about labels:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cIsn\u2019t it sad that we have to argue whether we\u2019re on the right or on the left or in the middle? Isn\u2019t it sad that that\u2019s what our community has come to? Isn\u2019t it sad that our nation is fighting over who\u2019s red and who\u2019s blue and who\u2019s gonna change color and who\u2019s not? Did we not get to a society that\u2019s better than that? Isn\u2019t that why you work both sides of the aisle? Isn\u2019t that why you work with all kinds of people? Isn\u2019t that why you put a smile on your face every morning and say I\u2019m the right person to represent you because I don\u2019t care what color you are \u2013 red, blue, green, yellow, whatever it may be?\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Miyagishima\u2019s strongest response of the night was a defense of Connor after Huerta accused her of taking multiple stances on issues.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI wish I could call her a flip-flopper, but that would be giving her too much credit, because even a flip-flopper can pick sides,\u201d Huerta said.<\/p>\n<p>Miyagishima responded by pointing out that Huerta once worked for Republican U.S. Rep. Steve Pearce and later worked for Democratic U.S. Rep. Harry Teague.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s a great point,\u201d Connor said.<\/p>\n<p>The agreement highlighted Connor\u2019s biggest problem: She has often sided with Miyagishima on issues. They both supported implementing the red-light camera program, for example.<\/p>\n<p>Connor needs to convince voters that Miyagishima isn\u2019t doing a good job and that she would do better. One issue on which the two have disagreed is the implementation of impact fees \u2013 Miyagishima supported them and Connor opposed them \u2013 and she highlighted that fact during the debate.<\/p>\n<p>But Huerta worked hard to portray his opponents as generally being in the same camp. Miyagishima helped him by coming to Connor\u2019s defense. And that\u2019s good for Miyagishima.<\/p>\n<h3>Miyagishima is in a good position<\/h3>\n<p>Though he\u2019s not the strongest debater, Miyagishima is in a good position. His opening statement explains why:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cAlthough many communities throughout our region are facing some serious challenges, we here in the City of Las Cruces have been extremely fortunate. In fact, the Milken Institute has named the City of Las Cruces one of the best performing small cities in the western region two years in a row. Just in the last year we have issued over 600 business licenses, created over 2,000 jobs&#8230; Our crime rate from last year has dropped from the previous year. We currently hold twice the amount that the state requires in cash reserves. We\u2019ve been able to implement curbside recycling as well as balance growth and development.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If Las Cruces is doing better than most cities, Connor certainly shares some credit. But as the incumbent in the race, Miyagishima is in the enviable position of being the candidate voters aren\u2019t likely to toss from office unless they\u2019re given a compelling reason.<\/p>\n<p>On Tuesday, Huerta and Connor spent lots of time fighting with each other. Both outperformed Miyagishima and gave voters reasons that they might make good mayors, but they didn\u2019t spend enough time giving voters reasons to show Miyagishima the door \u2013 in other words, rebutting the argument Miyagishima made in his opening statement for why he deserves to be re-elected.<\/p>\n<p>The race isn\u2019t over, and I\u2019m not making any predictions. But Connor and Huerta both need to make a more convincing case for kicking Miyagishima out of office than they did on Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>If you missed the debate, you can watch it <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2011\/10\/watch-the-cruces-mayoral-debate-join-the-liveblog\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><em>A prior version of this posting incorrectly stated that Huerta\u2019s mother is a member of the realtor\u2019s association political committee.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Michael Ray Huerta and Dolores Connor outperformed Las Cruces Mayor Ken Miyagishima at Tuesday\u2019s debate but didn\u2019t spend enough time rebutting his argument for why he deserves to be re-elected.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[145,214],"class_list":["post-33266","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-las-cruces","tag-las-cruces-election"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33266","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33266"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33266\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33266"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33266"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33266"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}