{"id":2685,"date":"2008-01-03T14:30:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-03T20:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2008\/01\/richardson-and-obama-may-be-targeting-edwards\/"},"modified":"2008-01-03T14:30:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-03T20:30:00","slug":"richardson-and-obama-may-be-targeting-edwards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2008\/01\/richardson-and-obama-may-be-targeting-edwards\/","title":{"rendered":"Richardson and Obama may be targeting Edwards"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a onblur=\"try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}\" href=\"http:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/R31GN8TQ7pI\/AAAAAAAAEXQ\/I7DO8VLKw8A\/s1600-h\/Richardson,+Bill.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;\" src=\"http:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/R31GN8TQ7pI\/AAAAAAAAEXQ\/I7DO8VLKw8A\/s200\/Richardson,+Bill.jpg\" alt=\"\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5151350754120887954\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a>Though <a href=\"http:\/\/www.richardsonforpresident.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Bill Richardson\u2019s<\/a> campaign denies an earlier report from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iowaindependent.com\/showDiary.do?diaryId=1782\" target=\"_blank\">Iowa Independent<\/a> that he will direct his supporters to caucus in the second round for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.barackobama.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Barack Obama<\/a> in precincts where he\u2019s not viable, the <a href=\"http:\/\/thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com\/2008\/01\/03\/obama-will-get-richardsons-second-choice-votes\/\" target=\"_blank\">New York Times<\/a> is now reporting the same thing.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Quoting a senior Obama adviser, the Times reports that Richardson will urge his supporters to pick Obama as their second choice \u2013 which Obama\u2019s campaign estimates will give him a seven- or eight-point boost. In exchange, Obama will urge supporters in places where he has more backers than he needs to win additional delegates to back <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city>, helping the governor reach the 15-percent threshold of viability in some precincts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><a onblur=\"try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}\" href=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/R31GNsTQ7oI\/AAAAAAAAEXI\/DoR2_Xj0AWs\/s1600-h\/Obama,+Barack.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;\" src=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/R31GNsTQ7oI\/AAAAAAAAEXI\/DoR2_Xj0AWs\/s200\/Obama,+Barack.jpg\" alt=\"\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5151350749825920642\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a>If it\u2019s true \u2013 and there is mounting evidence that it is \u2013 the strategy for both campaigns appears to be taking down <a href=\"http:\/\/www.johnedwards.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">John Edwards<\/a>. For the record, both campaigns officially deny that it\u2019s true.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">But here\u2019s the reality: <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> won\u2019t likely finish third or better tonight. He\u2019s trying to fight off a climbing <a href=\"http:\/\/www.joebiden.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Joe Biden<\/a> to finish fourth. <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> can finish fourth and still be in a respectable position only if Edwards doesn\u2019t finish first.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Edwards is currently third in the polls behind Obama and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hillaryclinton.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Hillary Clinton<\/a>, but the race between the three is very close. Edwards is much stronger in the rural areas of <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state><\/st1:place> than Obama and Clinton, and under the archaic Iowa Caucus system, that gives Edwards the advantage. Many politicos believe for that reason that Edwards is most likely to win the caucus tonight.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><a onblur=\"try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}\" href=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/R31GTsTQ7qI\/AAAAAAAAEXY\/zFClvkYvRp0\/s1600-h\/Edwards,+John.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;\" src=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/R31GTsTQ7qI\/AAAAAAAAEXY\/zFClvkYvRp0\/s200\/Edwards,+John.jpg\" alt=\"\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5151350852905135778\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a>Edwards has bet everything in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>. He has less money than Clinton and Obama and he\u2019s focused it all in one place. While Clinton and Obama can survive second- or third-place finishes tonight because they have strong organizations in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> and the Feb. 5 states, Edwards cannot.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">This is a do-or-die day for Edwards.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">If <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> were to urge his supporters, in places where he isn\u2019t viable, to support Obama in the second round of voting, he could help Obama defeat Edwards and, if that happens, effectively knock Edwards from the race.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Then all <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> has to do to is stay ahead of Biden and the other second-tier candidates, a goal Obama\u2019s extra support would help him accomplish. If Edwards doesn\u2019t finish first and <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> finishes fourth, the governor is in a position to potentially move into third place when voters in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> go to the polls on Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">If this is <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city>\u2019s strategy, he has to play a careful game of chess. He\u2019s teetering on the edge of being viable in a number of precincts, and many of the undecided caucus goers may pick him. <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> certainly doesn\u2019t want to give up support anywhere that he can finish at 15 percent or higher. But in places where he\u2019s not going to reach that threshold, why not move some pieces around to help Obama and hurt Edwards in preparation for <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Biden might have a similar strategy: beat <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> and help ensure Edwards doesn\u2019t finish first. So might <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chrisdodd.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Chris Dodd<\/a>. And <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dennis4president.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dennis Kucinich<\/a> has already told his supporters to pick Obama as their second choice. But, if the Times report is accurate, Obama\u2019s deal with <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> makes it even more likely that the governor will finish fourth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">If this all comes true \u2013 that <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> finishes fourth and Edwards finishes second or third \u2013 the governor just might be well positioned to be the alternative to Obama and Clinton in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>. <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> doesn\u2019t plan any rest after <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>. He\u2019ll be campaigning in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> on Friday morning and all the way until Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Stay tuned.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Though Bill Richardson\u2019s campaign denies an earlier report from the Iowa Independent that he will direct his supporters to caucus in the second round for Barack Obama in precincts where he\u2019s not viable, the New York Times is now reporting the same thing. Quoting a senior Obama adviser, the Times reports that Richardson will urge [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2685","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2685"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2685\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}