{"id":2676,"date":"2008-01-02T15:59:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-02T21:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2008\/01\/as-he-falls-in-polls-guv-says-he-will-shock-the-world\/"},"modified":"2008-01-02T15:59:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-02T21:59:00","slug":"as-he-falls-in-polls-guv-says-he-will-shock-the-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2008\/01\/as-he-falls-in-polls-guv-says-he-will-shock-the-world\/","title":{"rendered":"As he falls in polls, guv says he will &#8216;shock the world&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a onblur=\"try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}\" href=\"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/R3wKFsTQ7cI\/AAAAAAAAEVo\/21ixwqWTXbc\/s1600-h\/Richardsonforpresident.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;\" src=\"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/R3wKFsTQ7cI\/AAAAAAAAEVo\/21ixwqWTXbc\/s200\/Richardsonforpresident.jpg\" alt=\"\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5151003166712589762\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a>As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.richardsonforpresident.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Bill Richardson\u2019s<\/a> support in polls in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and <st1:state st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:state> continues to drop, the governor says he will \u201cshock the world\u201d when Democrats in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> caucus on Thursday. At the same time, <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> also appears to be backing away from previous statements that he has to finish third or better there to have a shot at the nomination.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> has said throughout the campaign that he had to place third or better in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and <st1:state st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:state>, hoping that would propel him to victory in <st1:state st=\"on\">Nevada<\/st1:state> and strong showings on Feb. 5 in states like <st1:state st=\"on\">New Mexico<\/st1:state>, <st1:state st=\"on\">Arizona<\/st1:state> and <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:state st=\"on\">California<\/st1:state><\/st1:place>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">But about a week ago he began downplaying <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state>, mentioning only <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> when saying he had to finish third or better. Then, in an article published today in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.abqjournal.com\/news\/state\/274228nm01-02-08.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Albuquerque Journal<\/a>, <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> didn\u2019t mention either state.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u201cI\u2019m in this race at least until Feb. 5, to see how I do in my own (Western) region,\u201d the Journal quoted him as telling a crowd in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Why the shift? <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city>\u2019s support in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>, and in national polls, continues to fall. <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city>\u2019s Real Clear Politics average of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2008\/president\/ia\/iowa_democratic_caucus-208.html\" target=\"_blank\">recent polls in Iowa<\/a> today is 5 percent \u2013 down from 7.2 percent on Dec. 19 \u2013 and his average of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2008\/president\/nh\/new_hampshire_democratic_primary-194.html\" target=\"_blank\">recent polls in New Hampshire<\/a> is 4.8 percent \u2013 down from 7 percent on Dec. 19. His average of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2008\/president\/us\/democratic_presidential_nomination-191.html\" target=\"_blank\">recent national polls<\/a> has fallen to 2 percent from his 2.9 percent average on Dec. 19.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Meanwhile, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.joebiden.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Joe Biden<\/a> has climbed to an average of 3 percent in recent national polls, 4.5 percent in recent <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> polls and 2.5 percent in recent <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:state st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:state><\/st1:place> polls.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\" class=\"MsoNormal\">\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\" class=\"MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-size:130%;\">Campaign claim doesn\u2019t match polls<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Polls \u2013 particularly under the archaic <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> caucus system \u2013 can be wrong. <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city>\u2019s campaign manager, Dave Contarino, put out a memo titled \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/action.richardsonforpresident.com\/page\/community\/post_group\/Headquarters\/CLQH\">Iowa Momentum<\/a>\u201d that claims the campaign has \u201cconfirmed\u201d 18,000 caucus supporters and expects to reach 22,000 by Thursday evening, which would give the governor the support of nearly 20 percent of caucus goers. In addition, he claims <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> is the \u201cconfirmed\u201d second choice of nearly 25 percent of <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> Democratic caucus goers, which is important under the system because, if a candidate\u2019s support doesn\u2019t reach 15 percent at a precinct, his or her supporters have to move to their second choice.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Considering that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hillaryclinton.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Hillary Clinton<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.johnedwards.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">John Edwards<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.barackobama.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Barack Obama<\/a> are all polling at between 26 and 29 percent in Iowa, Contarino\u2019s claim is a nearly outrageous one that isn\u2019t supported by a single independent poll. In addition, you can bet that, if internal polling backed it up, the campaign would have released it. Recent independent polls have placed <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city>\u2019s support in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> at anywhere between 2 and 12 percent.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city>\u2019s own backtracking on the importance of finishing third in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> suggests that even he doesn\u2019t believe he has anywhere near the level of support claimed by Contarino.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Still, <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city><\/st1:place> continues to put a positive spin on the situation, telling <a href=\"http:\/\/politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com\/2008\/01\/01\/richardson-i%E2%80%99m-gonna-shock-the-world%E2%80%99\/\" target=\"_blank\">CNN<\/a> that he\u2019s going to \u201cshock the world\u201d on Thursday. He has an army of hundreds of volunteers from <st1:state st=\"on\">New Mexico<\/st1:state> in <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state><\/st1:place> to implore Democrats to pick him, which could give him a boost. He will probably do better in the state\u2019s rural areas than in urban areas, which, as explained by <a href=\"http:\/\/haussamen.blogspot.com\/2008\/01\/in-iowa-anything-can-happen-on-thursday.html\">Carter Bundy<\/a>, is also a plus.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">And the governor has flooded the airwaves in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New   Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> with television ads, nearly keeping pace with the frontrunners. He has to be spending all his money to do it, hoping for a big fundraising boost if he can pull off a miracle in either state.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> has received one other boost in recent days: He was endorsed by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boston.com\/news\/local\/new_hampshire\/articles\/2007\/12\/30\/mccain_clinton_richardson_get_endorsements\/\" target=\"_blank\">Conway Daily Sun<\/a> in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>, which called him the only heavyweight in the race. The paper, which is the only to endorse him in either state, has a circulation of about 16,000.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u201cA handful of years as senator\u2026 simply does not stack up to Richardson\u2019s powerful r\u00e9sum\u00e9 as a former congressman, energy secretary, U.N. ambassador, and now, governor of New Mexico,\u201d the endorsement stated.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\" class=\"MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-size:130%;\">The most likely scenario<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">But that hasn\u2019t stopped <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> from sliding further behind the three frontrunners in the polls, and several articles have noted that the crowds showing up to hear Biden speak are growing. The senator spoke before 500 people on Tuesday \u2013 a number that rivals that of the Republican frontrunners \u2013 while <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> appeared before a crowd of about 70.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Still, enough <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> caucus goers remain undecided \u2013 which could mean they don\u2019t like the three frontrunners \u2013 that a second-tier candidate like Richardson or Biden could shock the world on Thursday. The most likely scenario, however, is that <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> is going to finish fourth or even fifth behind Biden. The governor\u2019s new focus on staying in the race until Feb. 5 regardless of where he finishes in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:state st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:state><\/st1:place> suggests he knows it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Check back throughout the day and evening on Thursday, as I\u2019ll have complete coverage of the Iowa Caucus. Expect results sometime after 7 <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:placename st=\"on\">p.m.<\/st1:placename> <st1:placetype st=\"on\">Mountain<\/st1:placetype><\/st1:place> Standard Time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As Bill Richardson\u2019s support in polls in Iowa and New Hampshire continues to drop, the governor says he will \u201cshock the world\u201d when Democrats in Iowa caucus on Thursday. At the same time, Richardson also appears to be backing away from previous statements that he has to finish third or better there to have a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2676"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2676\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}