{"id":22975,"date":"2010-10-31T23:01:48","date_gmt":"2010-11-01T05:01:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=22975"},"modified":"2010-10-31T23:01:51","modified_gmt":"2010-11-01T05:01:51","slug":"new-mexico%e2%80%99s-real-economic-driver","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2010\/10\/new-mexico%e2%80%99s-real-economic-driver\/","title":{"rendered":"New Mexico\u2019s real economic driver"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Paul Gessing takes an enormous leap of faith in his blog post<\/a> about the effectiveness of tax cuts. There is hardly conclusive evidence that the 2003 income tax cuts created any jobs, much less were responsible for the economic growth prior to the 2007 stock market crash.<\/p>\n

Like the Bush tax cuts, New Mexico\u2019s 2003 cuts disproportionately benefitted those in the very highest income brackets. One of the problems with the trickle-down sham upon which this tax-cut-as-economic-stimulus strategy is based is that the wealthy can do whatever they want with their tax cuts. They are free to enjoy a European vacation or to park the extra money in the bank \u2013 neither of which will create jobs nor increase incomes for Americans.<\/p>\n

A recent guest column by venture capitalist<\/a> Garrett Gruener, which ran in both the L.A. Times<\/a> and the Albuquerque Journal<\/a>, makes this valuable point: \u201cNone of my investments has ever been motivated by the rate at which I would have to pay personal income tax,\u201d he writes. What has motivated them is the presence (or potential) of a thriving market. But when the market isn\u2019t thriving because consumer demand is low (that happens when lots of people have lost their jobs or fear that they soon will), investors are more likely to sit on their assets than risk losing them.<\/p>\n

Then what did drive the growth?<\/h3>\n

So that leaves us with the question of what actually did drive the state\u2019s income and job growth in the early years of Richardson\u2019s administration. It helps to look at as objective a data source as possible. When you want to know about job and income growth, that means going to the U.S. Department of Labor<\/a> (DOL). According to the DOL\u2019s Bureau of Labor Statistics<\/a>, New Mexico\u2019s construction industry added more than 11,000 jobs between 2001 and 2007. Construction wages grew by 19 percent during that same time frame.<\/p>\n

This growth was caused by the housing bubble. We know this because when the housing bubble burst most of those jobs went away. Between 2008 and 2009, almost 10,000 construction jobs were lost, and those who still had jobs found that their wages had flat-lined. Other sectors that are connected to the housing industry, such as financing, experienced the same rise and fall.<\/p>\n

The other major factor in New Mexico\u2019s pre-recession job and income growth was the inflation in energy prices, which peaked in the summer of 2008. Mining employment grew from 15,000 jobs in 2003 to more than 20,000 in 2008, and wages had risen by a third. By 2009, after global energy prices had tanked, 2,600 jobs had gone away and wages had fallen. Sectors such as transportation, which are connected to the energy industry, saw a similar pattern.<\/p>\n

This points to a big problem with Gessing\u2019s theory: The tax cuts for the rich are still in place, but the jobs and increased income they allegedly created have gone away. If the tax cuts led to higher incomes or created new jobs, shouldn\u2019t that income and those jobs still be here?<\/p>\n

In fact, personal income has grown slightly since the onset of the Great Recession. But that was due to an increase in public assistance such as unemployment insurance benefits, food stamps, Medicaid, and others programs. These kinds of payments increase when the economy falters because people need them to replace lost income until they can get back on their feet.<\/p>\n

Tax cuts for the wealthy should end<\/h3>\n

Tax cuts for the wealthy do little, if anything, to create jobs in a bad economy because there are fewer consumers for the products and services those jobs create. Putting money into the hands of those who need it most and are, therefore, more likely to spend it \u2013 such as people who have lost their jobs and those working but earning low incomes \u2013 helps sustain consumer demand. Putting money into the hands of people who will use it for a European vacation does not.<\/p>\n

The Bush-era tax cuts for the very wealthy should be allowed to expire, as they were intended. Unfortunately, the New Mexico tax cuts did not include a sunset provision, so it will take action by the Legislature and new governor to reverse them. There seems too little political will for that, which is unfortunate because this would back some fairness to the state\u2019s tax system, which currently extracts the most from those who earn the least (see ITEP<\/a>\u2019s Who Pays?<\/a> report, pages 78 and 79).<\/p>\n

It would also help the state in making the necessary investment in programs such as education, health care, and public safety that are the real foundational infrastructure upon which a healthy economy is built.<\/p>\n

Bradley is the research director for N.M. Voices for Children<\/a>, which is is a member of Better Choices New Mexico<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Paul Gessing takes an enormous leap of faith in his blog post about the effectiveness of tax cuts. There is hardly conclusive evidence that the 2003 income tax cuts created any jobs, much less were responsible for the economic growth prior to the 2007 stock market crash.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1811,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1192,16],"tags":[118,107,116],"class_list":["post-22975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary","category-guest-columns","tag-economy","tag-roundhouse","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1811"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22975\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}