{"id":2137,"date":"2007-08-22T13:09:00","date_gmt":"2007-08-22T19:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2007\/08\/government-should-be-for-the-people\/"},"modified":"2009-08-22T15:01:58","modified_gmt":"2009-08-22T21:01:58","slug":"government-should-be-for-the-people","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2007\/08\/government-should-be-for-the-people\/","title":{"rendered":"Government should be for the people"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Hearing <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hillaryclinton.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Hillary Clinton<\/a> say recently that corporate lobbyists \u201crepresent real Americans\u201d helped me realize I\u2019m not too excited about the current slate of presidential candidates, primarily because I\u2019m skeptical of a system over which Corporate America has too much influence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The fact that the favorite to win the White House in 2008 doesn\u2019t understand that lobbyists don\u2019t represent the average American proves we have a big problem. I\u2019m not convinced that any of the candidates who are above the margin of error in the polls \u2013 Democrat or Republican \u2013 would bring about real change in a system that has been corrupted by corporate money.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Without serious ethics reform, policy debates on <st1:country-region st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iraq<\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region>, health care, energy independence and all other issues will continue to be too heavily influenced by corporations whose only interest is financial gain. The result is always a compromise between what\u2019s good for the richest of the rich and what\u2019s good for the rest of us.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The American people know this, and the resulting cynicism is a primary cause of public apathy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Many Americans find the Democratic presidential candidates refreshing because they offer short-term change, particularly on <st1:country-region st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iraq<\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region> and health care. The problem with the GOP candidates is a familiar one: They\u2019re all wealthy white men.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">But neither group is adequately discussing the core issue that taints all other policy debates in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Washington<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>. Perhaps that\u2019s because the major presidential candidates \u2013 including our governor \u2013 are themselves millionaires, or perhaps it\u2019s because they need the money of the wealthy to win elections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Among those who have a shot at winning, the only presidential candidate who has attempted to address this problem in any meaningful manner is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.barackobama.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Barack Obama<\/a>. He was the spokesman for the recently approved campaign in the Senate to reduce lobbyist influence in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Washington<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>, a bill <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\">President Bush<\/a> is now considering vetoing. When he began pushing for that legislation, Obama set the example by giving up flights on corporate jets.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Obama, like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.johnedwards.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">John Edwards<\/a>, doesn\u2019t take lobbyist money. However, both take money from other corporate interests. Is either really a candidate of change, as both proclaim?<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">What about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.richardsonforpresident.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Bill Richardson\u2019s<\/a> push for ethics reform in <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:state st=\"on\">New Mexico<\/st1:state><\/st1:place>? Consider this: He pushed last year for limits on campaign contributions while accepting hundreds of donations that would have violated his proposed limits. Contrast that with Obama\u2019s decision to set the example on lobbyist reform.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">In addition, many of <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city>\u2019s campaign contributors have been given lucrative state contracts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">I don\u2019t care if a candidate disagrees with me on policy issues. I care about whether he or she is someone who leads by example and with integrity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Our system of government is designed so that opposing sides come together to debate gray areas and find compromise. If we could fill the Congress and White House with ethical leaders who weren\u2019t overly influenced by corporate money, if we could have policy debates based on what\u2019s best for the American people instead of corporations, then we would find real solutions to <st1:country-region st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">America<\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region>\u2019s pressing issues.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">That\u2019s going to take serious, systemic reform. I\u2019m looking for the candidate who will lead <st1:country-region st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">America<\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region> to that future.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-style: italic;\" class=\"MsoNormal\">A version of this article was published today in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.abqtrib.com\/news\/2007\/aug\/22\/heath-haussamen-people\/\" target=\"_blank\">Albuquerque Tribune<\/a>. I write a column for the newspaper that runs on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hearing Hillary Clinton say recently that corporate lobbyists \u201crepresent real Americans\u201d helped me realize I\u2019m not too excited about the current slate of presidential candidates, primarily because I\u2019m skeptical of a system over which Corporate America has too much influence. The fact that the favorite to win the White House in 2008 doesn\u2019t understand that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haussamen-columns"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}