{"id":201387,"date":"2016-10-26T12:57:40","date_gmt":"2016-10-26T18:57:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=201387"},"modified":"2016-10-26T14:58:04","modified_gmt":"2016-10-26T20:58:04","slug":"plenty-of-blame-to-go-around-in-city-manager-debacle-in-hobbs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/10\/plenty-of-blame-to-go-around-in-city-manager-debacle-in-hobbs\/","title":{"rendered":"Plenty of blame to go around in city manager debacle in Hobbs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>COMMENTARY:<\/strong>\u00a0As if the presidential election hasn\u2019t made October frightening enough \u2013 Halloween has a tough act to follow! But seriously, this month I have been horrified that the exit terms for Hobbs City Manager J.J. Murphy have been negotiated in the shadows, with no courageous watchdog in sight (at least the one you\u2019d expect) to monitor and report on the public\u2019s business.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_201692\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 336px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-201692\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Marshall-Byron-336x262.jpg\" alt=\"Byron Marshall\" width=\"336\" height=\"262\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Marshall-Byron-336x262.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Marshall-Byron-768x599.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Marshall-Byron-771x601.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Marshall-Byron.jpg 881w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Courtesy photo<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Byron Marshall<\/p><\/div>\n<p>We in Hobbs go through this twice each month. On a late\u00a0Friday\u00a0afternoon, the City of Hobbs posts to its website the commission meeting agenda for the following Monday. The state\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmag.gov\/uploads\/files\/Publications\/ComplianceGuides\/Open%20Meetings%20Act%20Compliance%20Guide%202015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Open Meetings Act Compliance Guide<\/a> says that the regular meeting agenda of a public body like the Hobbs City Commission \u201cshall be available to the public and posted on the public body\u2019s web site\u201d at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.<\/p>\n<p>One would wish that weekend hours don\u2019t count in the 72-hour agenda-posting requirement, but sure enough, the compliance guides says it \u201capplies regardless of whether it includes a\u00a0Saturday, Sunday or holiday.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>So, say you are a Hobbs resident vigilantly watching for the agenda to be posted on the city\u2019s website on a\u00a0Friday\u00a0afternoon, intermittently refreshing the home page. The agenda finally appears at\u00a03:30 p.m., and you see for the first time the contents of the city manager\u2019s latest amended contract. You want to submit your opinion to the editor of the local newspaper, the Hobbs News-Sun, but the paper stops accepting submissions for Sunday publication at\u00a0noon\u00a0the day before. The News-Sun only publishes letters to the editor on Sundays, and there is no Monday edition published. What\u2019s the next-best option to convey your opinion on a matter of the public interest, aside from social media?<\/p>\n<p>You\u2019d like to address the Hobbs City Commission during the public comments portion of the meeting, but the mayor instructs the public at the beginning of each meeting that comments should not relate to items on the agenda, and <a href=\"http:\/\/hobbsnm.org\/files\/public_meetings\/city_commission\/2016\/Oct%203%20full%20packet.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">the printed agenda<\/a> reinforces the rule with the parenthetical \u201cFor non-agenda items.\u201d OK.<\/p>\n<p>So how about comments about the contract when it\u2019s being discussed during the meeting? Nope. As you can see in <a href=\"http:\/\/livestream.com\/accounts\/2058816\/events\/6447006\" target=\"_blank\">the archived video<\/a> of the Oct. 3 meeting (at 50:15), at no point does the mayor make public comments possible as a part of the commission\u2019s consideration of the actual contract measure, \u201cConsideration of Approval of an Amended Employment Agreement with City Manager J. J. Murphy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Fortunately for Hobbs taxpayers, approval of <a href=\"http:\/\/wethefourth.org\/files\/pdf\/proposed-murphy-agreement-2016-10-03.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">the amended contract<\/a>, which amounted to a severance agreement, was <a href=\"http:\/\/wethefourth.org\/files\/city-commission\/pdf\/2016-10-03-minutes-draft.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">rejected by a majority of the commissioners<\/a>. Why do I say \u201cfortunately?\u201d Because, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/MurphyThirdContractAmendment.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">his current contract<\/a> reads, if he \u201cvoluntarily resigns or retires from his position,\u201d he \u201cshall not be entitled to the \u2026 Severance unless all or a portion of the severance is specifically approved by City Commission at that time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>So, if he leaves the City of Hobbs for another job, receiving a severance should\u00a0be a non-issue. And since he\u2019s been diligently applying for local-government jobs for some time, we should just let him move on, instead of paying him his salary through the middle of 2018, as the amended contract reads.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>You may ask, \u201cWell, did the News-Sun at least run a story in the Sunday issue to inform the public about the amended contract up for approval at the Monday meeting?\u201d Nope. \u201cNot even a list of the agenda items?\u201d Nope. It is with blue-moon frequency that the News-Sun reports on a meeting\u2019s agenda before\u00a0the meeting. But in this rare case, someone who did\u00a0know what was going to be on the agenda more than 72 hours before the meeting, Mayor Sam Cobb, was able to get a guest column about the amended contract published.<\/p>\n<p>With the headline <a href=\"http:\/\/digital.olivesoftware.com\/olive\/apa\/hobbsnews\/SharedView.Article.aspx?href=NHN%2F2016%2F10%2F02&amp;id=Ar00400&amp;sk=86DD877D\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cHobbs transitioning to new city manager,&#8221;<\/a> Mayor Cobb was short on details but said \u201c[t]he key elements of the agreement\u201d are: \u201c1. Cessation of employment as City Manager on or before\u00a0June 1, 2017;\u201d and \u201c2. A continuation of Mr. Murphy\u2019s employment as a special consultant to the Mayor and City Commission through\u00a0July 2, 2018.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Cobb called the new contract \u201cvery common when amicable separation can occur between an individual and the entity he or she is serving and there are many upcoming issues\/projects to address,\u201d because \u201c[s]haring institutional knowledge related to these projects with his successor can provide potential cost savings to the city and eliminate project delays.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Very common, mayor? Really? I can&#8217;t think of any common man or woman who gets the kind of treatment Murphy seems to feel entitled to. Most employers who want a separation fire bad workers. And most employees looking for new jobs put in their notice once they&#8217;ve accepted a new position. Common people don&#8217;t even think along the lines of this commission and their pampered city manager.<\/p>\n<p>The city has numerous very capable, six-figure-salaried department heads who can see the city\u2019s current projects through to completion, in addition to general contractors and other already-contracted consultants. \u201cContinuation of (Murphy\u2019s) salary in the amount of $180,377.60 annually,\u201d in addition to all the other benefits, is not justifiable, particularly if he\u2019s already taken a job elsewhere that demands his full attention.<\/p>\n<p>Seriously, how many consultants do you know who charge their clients for professional development and the \u201ctravel, subsistence and registration expenses\u201d that go along with it? And that&#8217;s not all! Rather than the city commission being required to approve expenses in advance, the new contract gives lone approval authority to the mayor. <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2015\/07\/hobbs-managers-contract-evolution-exposes-sense-of-entitlement\/\" target=\"_blank\">It\u2019s been said before<\/a>: this is yet another contract that exposes Murphy\u2019s sense of entitlement.<\/p>\n<p>And since <a href=\"http:\/\/wethefourth.org\/files\/city-commission\/pdf\/2016-10-03-minutes-draft.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">the Oct. 3 meeting<\/a> in which the amended contract was rejected, the News-Sun still\u00a0has not reported on the contents of the contract, particularly what changes there are from Murphy\u2019s current employment contract. Fortunately, Nick Maxwell, curator of the website<a href=\"http:\/\/wethefourth.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=http:\/\/wethefourth.org&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1477503963467000&amp;usg=AFQjCNEgUfPaTJsYhI3iEkErWmIHY1pH1g\">\u00a0wethefourth.org<\/a>, developed <a href=\"http:\/\/wethefourth.org\/files\/pdf\/what-almost-happened-on-monday-oct-3-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">an outline of the changes<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Possibly the most startling language in the amended contract appears to give full immunity between the city and Murphy. Replacing the section that was before called \u201cInsurance,\u201d the section is now called \u201cIndemnification, Insurance and Litigation Expenses,\u201d which is now nearly as long as Murphy\u2019s compensation section. It states, in part, that \u201cthe parties agree to release any claims that they may have against one another for events occurring prior to the Effective Date. Murphy agrees not to bring any claims against any employee, official or agent of the City for events that have arisen or occurred prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. The City agrees not to bring any claims against Murphy for any events that have arisen or occurred prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Just soak that in, folks. What\u2019s happening in Hobbs sets a dangerous precedent for the rest of the state, should any other government executives decide to duplicate Murphy\u2019s contract. I pray the Hobbs Commission stands firm and rejects any other proposed contract amendments for Murphy. The resignation and contract buyout of Albuquerque Public Schools Superintendent Winston Brooks serving as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.abqjournal.com\/447111\/investigative-report-on-brooks-to-be-placed-in-separate-secret-file.html\" target=\"_blank\">another recent example<\/a>, no executive at any level of New Mexico government should be getting golden parachutes, legal-immunity deals and separate, secret personnel files.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, I implore one or more state legislators to champion legislation that will place limits on the contracts that public bodies can negotiate and approve for executives and other public employees. Severance packages and contract buyouts have become a way to either create unmerited job security or a lucrative payday, and New Mexico taxpayers should not be on the hook.<\/p>\n<p>What did\u00a0Hobbs residents get from the News-Sun regarding the failed contract amendment? Almost a week after the vote on the contract, the News-Sun published a finger-wagging Sunday editorial. With the headline <a href=\"http:\/\/digital.olivesoftware.com\/Olive\/ODN\/HobbsNews\/shared\/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=NHN%2F2016%2F10%2F09&amp;entity=Ar00407&amp;sk=7C458770\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cHobbs commission to blame for big contract,\u201d<\/a> the News-Sun wrote that Murphy is not to blame. While I agree that the commission has the ultimate responsibility for Murphy\u2019s runaway contract that could be the gift that keeps on giving if commissioners get this wrong, the News-Sun went so far as to say, \u201cSo how is throwing away $106,000 of the city\u2019s money going to change that (Murphy\u2019s leaving)? \u2026 Hobbs residents have a right to be angry, but if they are directing their anger at Murphy then they\u2019re sending it the wrong direction.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>All right. We won\u2019t place the blame squarely on Murphy, and we won\u2019t narrowly direct our anger at him. But there\u2019s more than the commissioners deserving of residents\u2019 scorn. The News-Sun also deserves some of the blame for where we are today and the anger that we residents feel.<\/p>\n<p>The journalism and media staff of the Pew Research Center wrote, in an essay entitled\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.journalism.org\/2005\/02\/01\/a-new-journalism-for-democracy-in-a-new-age\/\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cA New Journalism for Democracy in a New Age,\u201d<\/a> that \u201cTime and again history has taught us the heavy price we pay when the independence, aggressive vigilance, accuracy and credibility of the press fails.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On the front page of each Sunday issue, the News-Sun touts how much readers will save with the coupons inside. Through Murphy\u2019s four years, Hobbs has paid a heavy price. Just think what we could have saved if the newspaper had asked hard questions and reported the answers along the way.<\/p>\n<p><em>Byron\u00a0Marshall is a Hobbs High graduate and former NMSU student. In 2013, Marshall returned to Hobbs from Las Cruces to support and improve his community through activism and enhanced public dialogue about important \u2014 and often overlooked \u2014 issues that merit the community\u2019s consideration.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Just think what we could have saved if our local newspaper had asked hard questions and reported the answers along the way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":201692,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1192,16],"tags":[885,134,706],"class_list":["post-201387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary","category-guest-columns","tag-hobbs","tag-media","tag-transparency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201387\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/201692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}