{"id":1788,"date":"2007-05-30T10:20:00","date_gmt":"2007-05-30T16:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nmpolitics.net\/index\/2007\/05\/new-polls-confirm-richardsons-support-in-iowa-and-new-hampshire-lack-of-support-in-south-carolina\/"},"modified":"2007-05-30T10:20:00","modified_gmt":"2007-05-30T16:20:00","slug":"new-polls-confirm-richardsons-support-in-iowa-and-new-hampshire-lack-of-support-in-south-carolina","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2007\/05\/new-polls-confirm-richardsons-support-in-iowa-and-new-hampshire-lack-of-support-in-south-carolina\/","title":{"rendered":"New polls confirm Richardson&#8217;s support in Iowa and New Hampshire, lack of support in South Carolina"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a onblur=\"try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}\" href=\"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/Rl2kj4rd3QI\/AAAAAAAACcs\/Ly6Bscagdzs\/s1600-h\/Richardsonforpresident.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;\" src=\"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/_IabUCQmoheQ\/Rl2kj4rd3QI\/AAAAAAAACcs\/Ly6Bscagdzs\/s200\/Richardsonforpresident.jpg\" alt=\"\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5070389691906120962\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a>Gov. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.richardsonforpresident.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Bill Richardson<\/a> is holding steady in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and <st1:state st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:state> in two new polls, but his support in <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:state st=\"on\">South Carolina<\/st1:state><\/st1:place> is dismal.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The newest polls by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanresearchgroup.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">American Research Group<\/a> have <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> at 9 percent in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanresearchgroup.com\/pres08\/nhdem8-706.shtml\" target=\"_blank\">New Hampshire<\/a> and 8 percent in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanresearchgroup.com\/pres08\/iadem8-706.shtml\" target=\"_blank\">Iowa<\/a>, which puts him in fourth place in both states. His support in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanresearchgroup.com\/pres08\/scdem8-704.shtml\" target=\"_blank\">South Carolina<\/a>, however, is only 1 percent. He\u2019s tied for last place in that state and is well below the margin of error.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">April polls done by the group had <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> at 5 percent in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and 3 percent in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>. <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city>\u2019s lack of support in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">South Carolina<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> has been consistent since he jumped into the presidential race in January.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Those three states are among the five that currently have presidential nominating contests scheduled for January 2008. <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> has focused most of his time and almost all his money in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The newest polls each surveyed 600 likely Democratic caucus goers between May 23 and 26, so they were conducted before <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city>\u2019s Sunday performance on NBC\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/3032608\/\" target=\"_blank\">Meet the Press<\/a>. Though I thought he held his own on the show, most pundits thought <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city>\u2019s performance was mediocre at best, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2167195\/\" target=\"_blank\">Slate<\/a> even said he \u201cself-destructed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Each of the new polls has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The new polls reflect the growing support for <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> shown by other polls in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>. Earlier this month, two other polls had <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city> at 9 and 10 percent in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state>, and another had him at 10 percent in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The newest poll by the group has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hillaryclinton.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Hillary Clinton<\/a> in the lead in Iowa with 31 percent, while other polls have shown <a href=\"http:\/\/www.johnedwards.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">John Edwards<\/a> leading in that state and Clinton in third place.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">That\u2019s important because <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Clinton<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> is leading in most primary polls in other states. Winning <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> is critical to Edwards\u2019 candidacy. He\u2019s in second in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> with 25 percent in the newest poll. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.barackobama.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Barack Obama<\/a> is in third with 11 percent \u2013 not too far ahead of <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><st1:city st=\"on\">Clinton<\/st1:city> leads in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state> with 34 percent to Edwards\u2019 18 percent and Obama\u2019s 15 percent. She also has 34 percent in <st1:place st=\"on\"><st1:state st=\"on\">South Carolina<\/st1:state><\/st1:place>, while Edwards has 30 percent and Obama has 18 percent.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Most of the new polls released this month in <st1:state st=\"on\">Iowa<\/st1:state> and <st1:state st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:state> show <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> within striking distance of the third-place candidate in those states. Another significant jump and he could be among the three frontrunners, instead of nipping at their heels.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Since the first polls reflected growing support in those two states earlier this month, <st1:city st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> has increased his advertising. However, the next polls will take into account <st1:city st=\"on\">Richardson<\/st1:city>\u2019s Meet the Press performance and his upcoming performance at this weekend\u2019s second Democratic presidential candidate debate in <st1:state st=\"on\"><st1:place st=\"on\">New Hampshire<\/st1:place><\/st1:state>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gov. Bill Richardson is holding steady in Iowa and New Hampshire in two new polls, but his support in South Carolina is dismal. The newest polls by American Research Group have Richardson at 9 percent in New Hampshire and 8 percent in Iowa, which puts him in fourth place in both states. His support in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1788\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}