{"id":166544,"date":"2016-07-06T11:38:27","date_gmt":"2016-07-06T17:38:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=166544"},"modified":"2016-07-07T10:52:33","modified_gmt":"2016-07-07T16:52:33","slug":"border-utility-finds-itself-in-hot-water","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/07\/border-utility-finds-itself-in-hot-water\/","title":{"rendered":"Border utility finds itself in hot water"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_166777\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignnone\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-166777\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sierra-Ramon-3-771x562.jpg\" alt=\"Ramon Sierra\" width=\"771\" height=\"562\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sierra-Ramon-3-771x562.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sierra-Ramon-3-336x245.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sierra-Ramon-3-768x560.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sierra-Ramon-3-1170x853.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sierra-Ramon-3.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Heath Haussamen \/ NMPolitics.net<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ramon Sierra, a resident of the Anapra neighborhood in Sunland Park, is among those pushing for better communication and improvements to the region&#8217;s water system. \u201cIt is quite hard to say I trust them. I still buy my bottled water,&#8221; he said.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>SUNLAND PARK \u2014 Serving the Southern New Mexico border communities of Sunland Park and Santa Teresa, the Camino Real Regional Utility Authority (CRRUA) is under pressure on multiple fronts.<\/p>\n<p>Recent revelations of <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/06\/is-sunland-park-the-borders-flint-michigan\/\" target=\"_blank\">levels of arsenic that were above health standards<\/a>\u00a0in the public utility\u2019s water, Clean Water Act violations, and management troubles have all drawn the attention of Southern New Mexico elected officials as well as state and federal environmental regulators, even to the extent that the construction of an urgently needed new wastewater treatment plant is on indefinite hold.<\/p>\n<p>Most importantly, CRRUA\u2019s credibility with local residents who use the system\u2019s water drawn from underground wells is in tatters.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"module align-left half type-aside\">\n<h3>About this article<\/h3>\n<p>This story was produced by\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/frontera.nmsu.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\">Frontera NorteSur<\/a>,\u00a0a U.S.-Mexico border news service run by the Center for Latin American and Border Studies at New Mexico State University. This story was made possible in part by the Fund for Investigative Journalism.<\/p>\n<h3>Read more<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/07\/following-wifes-death-anapra-resident-worries-about-kids-who-drink-tap-water\/\" target=\"_blank\">Following wife&#8217;s death, Anapra resident worries about kids who drink tap water<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/06\/is-sunland-park-the-borders-flint-michigan\/\" target=\"_blank\">Is Sunland Park the border&#8217;s Flint, Michigan?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/aside>\n<p>In a letter to utility customers that followed\u00a0an <span class=\"aBn\" data-term=\"goog_651010630\"><span class=\"aQJ\">April 21<\/span><\/span> notification about\u00a0arsenic problems (sent per Safe Drinking Water Act regulations), CRUUA Executive Director Brent Westmoreland listed water sample test results that showed a consistent pattern of arsenic violations from February 2012 to April 2016. Multiple violations were detected in all parts of the utility\u2019s water system, including wells, the two arsenic treatment plants, and\u00a0a storage tank.<\/p>\n<p>The Dallas office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) told Frontera NorteSur (FNS)\u00a0that \u201cthe latest data\u201d in their possession shows that CRRUA \u201ceither missed or did not\u201d correctly sample arsenic three times within the past three years. CRRUA also\u00a0failed to issue public advisory notices for three quarters. Such samples and notifications are\u00a0required by law. The EPA underscored that quarterly samples are required at four sites.<\/p>\n<p>Health studies have linked long-term exposure to arsenic, a naturally occurring substance commonly found in groundwater in New Mexico, Mexico and other regions of the world, to cancer, skin disorders, high blood pressure and other maladies.<\/p>\n<p>Although CRRUA has now declared two arsenic treatment plants repaired, and arsenic levels in community water supplies within the health standards, Sunland Park City Manager Bob Gallagher considers the utility\u2019s response inadequate.\u00a0The city government plans to begin its own independent testing of water from home faucets and storage tanks this month, Gallagher told FNS.<\/p>\n<p>Approved by the Sunland Park City Council, the testing will cover all council districts, with special attention placed on the low-income neighborhood of Anapra, the oldest section of the city and a place where many seniors with difficult access to alternative water supplies are\u00a0burdened with antiquated water infrastructure.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, Sunland Park will test water in the unincorporated community of Santa Teresa to the west of the city limits, which is also served by CRRUA.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re reaching out to our neighbors and saying, we\u2019re doing this and we\u2019re adding you,\u201d Gallagher said, explaining the water testing will be outsourced to Wilson and Company, which will then send the samples to a certified lab that will provide copies of the results to both Sunland Park and the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED). The results will be publicized in local media, he said.<\/p>\n<p>Acknowledging that the testing won\u2019t come cheap, Gallagher estimated a monthly price tag between $1,000 and $1,500. He said Sunland Park would insist that CRRUA reimburse city coffers &#8212; a proposition the utility initially did not accept.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI just hope and pray it\u2019s OK,\u201d Gallagher said about Sunland Park\u2019s water quality. \u201cIf it\u2019s OK, what\u2019s wrong with bending over backwards and being conservative with someone\u2019s safety?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In response to an earlier rebuff to a proposal by Sunland Park officials that CRRUA provide bottled water to seniors, who can be more vulnerable to arsenic poisoning, Gallagher said \u201cwe are going to have to revisit that subject matter if the testing results (show) they are not in compliance.\u201d Underlying the arsenic controversy is the ongoing mystery of precisely why and for how long CRRUA\u2019s two treatment plants were down.<\/p>\n<p>An investigation by NMED in May found that one of CRRUA\u2019s two arsenic treatment plants, the facility intended to service the Santa Teresa industrial zone, was down for \u201cmaybe more than two years\u201d &#8212; considerably longer than the six months originally reported by Westmoreland to the CRRUA Board of Directors.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of the Sunland Park arsenic treatment plant, which services a residential area, the NMED attributed a down time estimated at more than one year to a switch that wasn\u2019t correctly pre-programmed, causing the plant to stop functioning after about one hour. According to Gallagher, the plant was out of commission for \u201cat least a year-and-a-half.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>&#8216;It&#8217;s kind of hard to return to trust&#8217;<\/h3>\n<p>Arsenic was a hot topic at last month\u2019s CRRUA board meeting. Longtime Sunland Park resident <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/07\/following-wifes-death-anapra-resident-worries-about-kids-who-drink-tap-water\/\" target=\"_blank\">Ramon Sierra<\/a> and others were surprised to hear Westmoreland say the arsenic plants had been fixed since <span class=\"aBn\" data-term=\"goog_651010631\"><span class=\"aQJ\">May 26<\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Though still skeptical about CRRUA\u2019s ability to do its job, Sierra was nevertheless willing to give the local utility a chance. \u201cI believe you guys are progressive and doing things. I do,\u201d he told the board. \u201cBut why not ask for help?&#8221;<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>A full CRRUA Board of Directors was present to hear Sierra\u2019s concerns. The members include Sunland Park City Councilors Ken Giove and Francisco Jayme; Joshua Orozco, board chairman; District 34 state Rep.\u00a0Bill Gomez; Do\u00f1a Ana County Commissioners David Garcia and Benjamin Rawson; and Susan Yturralde, representative of New Mexico state Sen.\u00a0Joseph Cervantes.<\/p>\n<p>Gomez said at the meeting that he had not known about arsenic problems or been\u00a0informed about them in a timely fashion. Westmoreland said\u00a0CRRUA, in conjunction with NMED, was now on top of water sample testing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI understand they are on top of it,\u201d Giove said. &#8220;What about <span class=\"aBn\" data-term=\"goog_651010632\"><span class=\"aQJ\">six months from now<\/span><\/span>? What about a year from now? It\u2019s kind of hard to return trust when you don\u2019t have any.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Giove noted violations dating back to 2012. \u201cIt doesn\u2019t make sense,\u201d he said, that treatment plants were not functioning and board members and\u00a0residents weren\u2019t informed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou\u2019re right. It doesn\u2019t make sense, but it happened,\u201d Westmoreland conceded at the meeting, describing how he assumed his job late last year amid organizational disarray.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI started asking questions why (arsenic treatment plants) weren\u2019t operating and functioning,\u201d Westmoreland responded, insisting that he had begun\u00a0patching together a team to address the issue.<\/p>\n<p>CRRUA Board Chair Joshua Orozco recalled \u201ca crazy time\u201d last year when the utility had no executive director or operations director, concluding that, \u201cbecause of that chaos, we weren\u2019t informed about the (arsenic) plants.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The board meeting shed no light on who exactly was responsible for allowing the arsenic treatment plants to sit in disrepair for so long or why customer notification of arsenic violations was inconsistent since 2012. CRRUA consultant Eric Lopez offered an alternative explanation to the notification failures. While CRRUA does its own field tests for arsenic, the official tests are done by NMED, which then notifies CRRUA of the results, Lopez said. The state environmental agency only recently sent CRRUA a list of test results that covered violations dating back to two years, he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019ve been here a year and never seen anything like that,\u201d Lopez said.<\/p>\n<p>Messages to NMED personnel in Las Cruces and Santa Fe seeking comment were not returned in time for this story.<\/p>\n<p>Sunland Park City Councilor Olga Nu\u00f1ez, who represents Anapra, urged accountability, especially when the residents of her neighborhood realize that \u201ctheir health is being sacrificed.\u201d CRRUA \u201cneeds to be transparent with the residents of Sunland Park,\u201d Nu\u00f1ez said.<\/p>\n<p>Santa Teresa resident Paul Maxwell conducted two independent tests of\u00a0Sunland Park and Santa Teresa water, including a sample from Ramon Sierra\u2019s home, this past spring. They revealed amounts of arsenic that exceed health standards. At the meeting, Maxwell said\u00a0the board should not lose sight of the problem.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe issue is not whether residents receive notification, but whether residents get good water. Residents of Anapra don\u2019t have good, quality water,\u201d Maxwell said.<\/p>\n<h3>Clean Water Act violations<\/h3>\n<p>High levels of arsenic in drinking water are not the only environmental controversy surrounding CRRUA. In October 2015, the EPA slapped CRRUA with proposed <a href=\"https:\/\/ofmpub.epa.gov\/apex\/tocar\/f?p=124:40:::NO:40:P40_ATTACH_ID:2974\" target=\"_blank\">EPA Administrative Order CWA 2016-1816<\/a> for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The action was based on reviews of state\u00a0inspections of CRRUA facilities in November 2014 and February 2015 that resulted in a long laundry list of violations and irregularities.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_166780\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 336px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-166780\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-CRRUA-offices-336x226.jpg\" alt=\"the Camino Real Regional Utility Authority\" width=\"336\" height=\"226\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-CRRUA-offices-336x226.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-CRRUA-offices-768x516.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-CRRUA-offices-771x518.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-CRRUA-offices-1170x786.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-CRRUA-offices.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Heath Haussamen \/ NMPolitics.net<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">The headquarters for the Camino Real Regional Utility Authority in Sunland Park.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Among the specific violations cited were the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States\u00a0above permit effluent limitations; failure to submit prior notice of new discharges; unpermitted discharges; failure to properly operate and maintain wastewater treatment plants; and a failure to have competent operational staff.<\/p>\n<p>Signed by John Blevins, director of the compliance and assurance division for EPA\u2019s Region 6 in Dallas, the order mentioned a February 2015 observation by NMED of discharges from CRRUA\u2019s Sunland Park wastewater treatment plant into the Rio Grande, a river shared by the U.S. and Mexico. When there is water in the hyper-managed Rio Grande, it\u2019s not uncommon for residents of neighboring Ciudad Ju\u00e1rez to take dips in the river on hot days.<\/p>\n<p>EPA\u2019s October 2015 administrative order gave CRRUA deadlines beginning at 30 days to comply with federal regulations. More than <span class=\"aBn\" data-term=\"goog_651010633\"><span class=\"aQJ\">eight months later<\/span><\/span>, however, the utility is still not in compliance with the order, according to an EPA spokesperson.<\/p>\n<p>Two years before the EPA action, in October 2013, CRRUA \u201cexceeded the maximum contaminant level for total coliform bacteria in distribution, and failed to take a required sample at the well source <span class=\"aBn\" data-term=\"goog_651010634\"><span class=\"aQJ\">within 24 hours<\/span><\/span>,\u201d the EPA reported.<\/p>\n<p>No problems have arisen with coliform bacteria in CRRUA\u2019s water since 2013, according to the EPA.<\/p>\n<p>Hours before the June 13 CRRUA board meeting, Claudia Hosch, a representative of EPA Region 6\u2019s Water Quality Protection Division, met with CRRUA staff and board members at the water utility\u2019s Sunland Park office off\u00a0McNutt Road.<\/p>\n<p>The stakes of the meeting were high. CRRUA is planning to construct a new wastewater treatment facility costing more than $11 million, of which $8 million is coming from a June 2015 grant approved by the North American Development Bank and channeled through the EPA\/NADB Border Environment Infrastructure Fund. The balance is expected to come from the State of New Mexico.<\/p>\n<p>For the EPA, availability of the $8 million grant is contingent upon the satisfactory resolution of CRRUA management shortfalls that were identified in a scathing March 2016 report by the Albuquerque-based Southwest Environment Finance Center, which was contracted by NMED to do an assessment of CRRUA.<\/p>\n<p>Both the report and the future wastewater plant were on the table at the June 13 EPA-CRRUA meeting, \u201cbut no firm agreements\/commitments were made,\u201d the EPA spokesperson contacted by FNS said in an e-mail.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere is $8 million\u00a0of federal funding on the line,\u201d CCRUA Board Chair Orozco said at the June 13 board meeting, shortly after conferring with EPA. \u201cWithout it, we can\u2019t bring in more houses or people to this region. We want this money and we have to work with EPA.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>If CCRUA is to move forward, the New Mexico utility must provide EPA with \u201ctimelines when given deficiencies will be corrected,\u201d the EPA spokesperson wrote in an email to FNS.<\/p>\n<h3>A questionable closed meeting<\/h3>\n<p>Alerted through the grapevine that the June 13 EPA-CCRUA meeting was public, local residents, four Sunland Park City Council members and this reporter showed up at CRRUA headquarters by the <span class=\"aBn\" data-term=\"goog_651010635\"><span class=\"aQJ\">1:30 p.m.<\/span><\/span> meeting time.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_166782\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 336px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-166782\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sunland-Park-treatment-plant-336x232.jpg\" alt=\"Sunland Park water treatment plant\" width=\"336\" height=\"232\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sunland-Park-treatment-plant-336x232.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sunland-Park-treatment-plant-768x530.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sunland-Park-treatment-plant-771x533.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sunland-Park-treatment-plant-1170x808.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/7.4.16-Sunland-Park-treatment-plant.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Heath Haussamen \/ NMPolitics.net<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">A Camino Real Regional Utility Authority water treatment plant atop a dusty hill in Sunland Park, within sight of the U.S.\/Mexico border.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Orozco and consultant Sue Padilla entered\u00a0the lobby and said\u00a0the meeting would be restricted to EPA and staff, much to the chagrin of the waiting group. Padilla said she had posted a \u201cNotice of Potential Quorum\u201d advising to that effect.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe meeting is not a public meeting of the governmental bodies,\u201d the notice signed by CRRUA Office Manager Lorraine Ortega read in part. \u201cNo policy will be formulated, nor will any discussions be had for the purpose of taking action, within the authority of the governmental bodies. The members of the governmental bodies will take no official vote or other action.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Eager to vent their concerns, residents were miffed at the closed doors. \u201cI think they\u2019re being silly,\u201d said Paul Maxwell.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI was to the belief that it was to answer questions,\u201d Sierra said, contending that EPA should be \u201ctalking to the people who\u2019ve been affected first.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Susan Boe, executive director of the nonprofit New Mexico Foundation for Open Government (FOG), told FNS that she had never before seen a \u201cNotice of Potential Quorum.\u201d Boe stressed that under the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmag.gov\/uploads\/files\/Publications\/ComplianceGuides\/Open%20Meetings%20Act%20Compliance%20Guide%202015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">N.M.\u00a0Open Meetings Act<\/a> the possibility of a quorum of elected or public officials meeting to discuss and formulate policy is crucial in determining whether such a gathering must be open to the public.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf there is significant public discussion, meetings should be open,\u201d Boe said. \u201cTechnicalities and other policies aside, FOG encourages (organizations) to err on the side of transparency.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The full CRRUA Board of Directors wound up participating in the June 13 meeting with the EPA, according to Board member Giove. Advised about the quorum on June 13, Boe wrote in a follow-up e-mail to FNS: \u201cBased upon what you have told me, I guess there were public policy discussions and therefore the meeting should have been open to the public.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the most recent minutes from the CRRUA monthly board meetings posted <a href=\"http:\/\/www.crrua.org\/meetings\" target=\"_blank\">on the utility\u2019s website<\/a> date back to March of this year &#8212; prior to news about the arsenic violations. According to Boe, the Open Meetings Act requires government and public bodies to take minutes and prepare drafts within 10 working days of a relevant meeting for approval or other action at the next meeting a quorum is present.<\/p>\n<p>21st century New Mexico, however, does not require public entities to post their minutes on the Internet, instead sometimes forcing interested citizens to resort to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmag.gov\/uploads\/files\/Publications\/ComplianceGuides\/Inspection%20of%20Public%20Records%20Compliance%20Guide%202015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Inspection of Public Records Act<\/a>\u00a0&#8212; an often time-consuming and costly endeavor &#8212; to obtain minutes, she added.<\/p>\n<h3>&#8216;I still buy my bottled water&#8217;<\/h3>\n<p>Yet another CRRUA-related controversy is unsettling Sunland Park. For years, residents have battled or complained about the large regional landfill in their community. Now, CRRUA is importing wastewater for treatment from the Southern New Mexico community of La Union.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere is a bad stench in the middle of the afternoon in Sunland Park, and we believe it\u2019s tied to the waste that comes from La Union,\u201d said Gallagher, Sunland Park&#8217;s city\u00a0manager. In a June 16 letter to Gallagher, CRRUA Executive Director Westmoreland stated that 30,000 gallons of wastewater flow daily along a 13-mile stretch from La Union to Sunland Park. Westmoreland wrote that the utility was applying chemical treatments as a remedy, and the measure had \u201csignificantly reduced the odor at the plant\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Giove described the odor problem as periodic. \u201cA couple of weeks ago it was <span class=\"aBn\" data-term=\"goog_651010636\"><span class=\"aQJ\">11:30<\/span><\/span> at night &#8212; it reeked,\u201d he told FNS.<\/p>\n<p>For Gallagher, the environmental concerns connected to CRRUA add up to a problem beyond the parameters of local government. Sunland Park\u2019s city manager advocates a public meeting on CRRUA with the presence of NMED and EPA, adding he hopes to speak personally with Ron Curry, EPA Region 6 administrator, during the first part of July.<\/p>\n<p>The EPA\u2019s Dallas office said no public meeting on CRRUA was scheduled.<\/p>\n<p>For his part, CCRUA customer Ramon Sierra said he is waiting for his next bill to see if it contains new information about water quality. \u201cIt is quite hard to say I trust them. I still buy my bottled water,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recent revelations of high arsenic levels, Clean Water Act violations, and management troubles have all drawn the attention of Southern New Mexico elected officials as well as state and federal environmental regulators.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2732,"featured_media":166777,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[147,3298,167,277],"class_list":["post-166544","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-environment","tag-santa-teresa","tag-sunland-park","tag-water"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2732"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166544"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166544\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/166777"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}