{"id":164377,"date":"2016-06-28T12:56:27","date_gmt":"2016-06-28T18:56:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=164377"},"modified":"2016-06-29T09:37:15","modified_gmt":"2016-06-29T15:37:15","slug":"dems-finally-pick-fight-over-guns-but-lose-sight-of-peoples-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/06\/dems-finally-pick-fight-over-guns-but-lose-sight-of-peoples-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"Dems finally pick fight over guns but lose sight of people\u2019s rights"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>COMMENTARY:\u00a0<\/strong>Democrats are finally standing up to the partisan stonewalling of Republicans in Congress and the influence of the NRA. In the wake of the slaughter of 49 people <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/news-event\/2016-orlando-shooting\" target=\"_blank\">in Orlando<\/a>, they\u2019re proposing banning gun sales to people on terrorist watch lists.<\/p>\n<p>But the Democrats\u2019 newfound spine is overshadowed by the fact that they are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vox.com\/2016\/6\/20\/11953254\/guns-terror-watch-list\" target=\"_blank\">picking the wrong fight<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_55852\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 336px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-55852\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Haussamen-Heath1-336x222.jpg\" alt=\"Heath Haussamen\" width=\"336\" height=\"222\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Haussamen-Heath1-336x222.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Haussamen-Heath1-768x508.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Haussamen-Heath1-771x510.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Haussamen-Heath1-1170x773.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Haussamen-Heath1.jpg 1262w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Heath Haussamen<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The secret government watch lists flag an unknown number of Americans as possible terrorists. Many probably are dangerous. But others <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/10\/06\/AR2006100601360.html\" target=\"_blank\">wrongly<\/a> end up on such lists. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2014\/jul\/24\/us-terrorism-watchlist-work-no-fly-list\" target=\"_blank\">You and I could<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2014\/07\/25\/terrorist-watch-list_n_5617599.html\" target=\"_blank\">end up on a list<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/news\/politics-government\/capitol-alert\/article49066450.html\" target=\"_blank\">Members of Congress<\/a> have been mistaken for people on lists. So has someone I know. The lists are deeply flawed and disproportionately affect Arab Americans and other people of color \u2013 and that\u2019s why they shouldn\u2019t be used to take away people\u2019s rights.<\/p>\n<p>In an effort address Second Amendment concerns, Democrats have proposed an appeals process for those who are wrongly denied the constitutional right to buy a gun. That sort of take-first, question-later attitude toward people\u2019s rights worries me.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/06\/28\/AR2010062802134.html\" target=\"_blank\">upheld<\/a> an individual\u2019s right to own a firearm. Looking for loopholes around constitutional rights in the interest of security sets a bad precedent. It also discriminates against the poor \u2013 who have less ability to challenge government action and are disproportionately people of color.<\/p>\n<p>The party of the left claims to be the defender of people\u2019s rights and working to dismantle structural racism. That\u2019s not apparent right now.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>But that isn\u2019t surprising. After all, Democratic President Barack Obama gave the OK to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2014\/jun\/23\/us-justification-drone-killing-american-citizen-awlaki\" target=\"_blank\">assassinate an American citizen<\/a> who arguably had a right to a trial. Obama also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/blog\/new-justice-department-documents-show-huge-increase-warrantless-electronic-surveillance?redirect=blog\/national-security-technology-and-liberty\/new-justice-department-documents-show-huge-increase\" target=\"_blank\">expanded domestic warrantless spying<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>And presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, not presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, has the apparent financial backing <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/04\/defense-contractor-employees-give-the-most-money-to-hillary-clinton\/\" target=\"_blank\">of the military industrial complex<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Our last Republican president, George W. Bush, prioritized security over our rights. Obama has ramped up those efforts. What\u2019s next? Will our government seek the authority to take other constitutional rights too?<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s happened before, and some want to take us back to horrible moments in America\u2019s history. Trump suggests banning Muslims <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2015\/12\/07\/politics\/donald-trump-muslim-ban-immigration\/\" target=\"_blank\">from entering the United States<\/a>. Possible Trump running mate Newt Gingrich wants to <a href=\"http:\/\/talkingpointsmemo.com\/livewire\/newt-gingrich-proposes-creating-new-house-unamerican-activities-committee\" target=\"_blank\">revive the U.S. House Un-American Activities Committee<\/a>, which began in the 1930s as an attempt to stop Nazism but became a witch-hunt targeting celebrities, artists, activists and scholars.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/J._Edgar_Hoover\" target=\"_blank\">That era\u2019s FBI<\/a> sought to discredit dissenters including <a href=\"http:\/\/kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu\/encyclopedia\/encyclopedia\/enc_federal_bureau_of_investigation_fbi\/\" target=\"_blank\">Martin Luther King, Jr.<\/a> Today the Democrats\u2019 gun proposal could give frightening authority to a federal government that might be run by Trump.<\/p>\n<p>We need to address mass shootings and other homicides. We should fight for sensible gun-regulation proposals like requiring background checks for purchases <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gun_show_loophole\" target=\"_blank\">at gun shows<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But we must also guard against an overreaching and discriminatory police state. U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently railed against a majority ruling letting law enforcement use in court some evidence obtained during unlawful stops.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your identification, and check it for outstanding traffic warrants \u2013 even if you are doing nothing wrong,\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2016\/06\/utah-streiff-sotomayor\/487922\/\" target=\"_blank\">Sotomayor wrote<\/a>, adding that the ruling \u201cimplies that you are not a citizen of a democracy but the subject of a carceral state, just waiting to be cataloged.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She\u2019s right. Democrats in Congress should heed her warning in the gun debate.<\/p>\n<p><em>A prior version of this commentary stated that actor Mark Ruffalo was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/film\/2010\/nov\/29\/mark-ruffalo-terrorism-watchlist-gasland\" target=\"_blank\">reportedly<\/a> put on a watch list in 2010 because he spoke out against natural gas drilling. That report\u00a0was based on a claim the actor himself made. But Ruffalo\u00a0later <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/entertainment\/gossip\/mark-ruffalo-terrorist-watch-list-story-fantastical-article-1.469270\" target=\"_blank\">changed his story<\/a> and said he was never on the watch list, so we&#8217;ve removed that statement\u00a0from this commentary. NMPolitics.net regrets including Ruffalo&#8217;s original claim in this commentary.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We should fight for sensible gun-regulation proposals like requiring background checks for purchases at gun shows. But we must also guard against an overreaching and discriminatory police state.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":55852,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1192,10],"tags":[708,135,2109,226,143,116],"class_list":["post-164377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary","category-haussamen-columns","tag-2016-election","tag-democratic-party","tag-guns","tag-presidential-race","tag-race-and-ethnicity","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164377","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164377"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164377\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55852"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164377"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164377"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164377"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}