{"id":140448,"date":"2016-03-30T15:45:38","date_gmt":"2016-03-30T21:45:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=140448"},"modified":"2018-09-14T16:05:21","modified_gmt":"2018-09-14T22:05:21","slug":"a-cold-trail-contributions-and-subsidies-in-new-mexico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/03\/a-cold-trail-contributions-and-subsidies-in-new-mexico\/","title":{"rendered":"A cold trail: contributions and subsidies in New Mexico"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ced.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Committee for Economic Development<\/a>, a pro-business think tank in Arlington, Virginia, recently issued a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ced.org\/pdf\/NM_Report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">report<\/a>\u00a0claiming New Mexico\u2019s economic stagnation is fueled by \u201ccrony capitalism,\u201d which includes favors in exchange for campaign contributions.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_54908\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 336px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/pictures-of-money\/17123251389\/in\/photolist-s6895e-chEwR9-bH1iX8-bt4mNt-42PQoC-a2YSa6-62QVKf-bta55K-dB7F8e-dK2oa7-aFDjPB-aYWk56-aFATbM-aFAaK6-aFAQEv-snzAJp-QxcaH-s4fksR-cMnty-bZvUDS-bta3kH-brd1K2-62LFqP-dTUAhR-5p8w8o-7jm7SP-8F5t1j-dSZe91-dUSc9a-a5SwX-dSK3tm-biaRHp-68vjKV-68zxeQ-9C9vCS-aFAPtx-9ZA9J6-cXNz15-9kJxyv-b6MUJK-68zxij-aFDkRt-aFDet2-bDwJ11-5DfGXv-bmm93i-55FLSR-aFDcrg-bf3Nge-nQZguc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-54908 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-336x216.jpg\" alt=\"Money\" width=\"336\" height=\"216\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-336x216.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-768x494.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-771x495.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-1170x752.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-780x500.jpg 780w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Pictures of Money \/ Creative Commons<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">The 10 companies that benefit most from state subsidies in New Mexico have\u00a0not been major contributors to state\u00a0candidates and party committees. (<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">photo cc info<\/a>)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The National Institute on Money in State Politics decided to examine campaign contributions from the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/show-me?s=NM&amp;y=2014,2013,2012,2011,2010,2009,2008,2007,2006,2005,2004,2003,2002,2001,2000&amp;f-core=1&amp;f-fc=2&amp;d-eid=1325,1026,599168,9045754,9045754,1233,16039,668,1017,2741#[{1|gro=d-eid\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ten companies<\/a>\u00a0that benefited most from state subsidies in New Mexico, using a list provided by\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org\/prog.php?statesum=NM\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Good Jobs First<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The examination revealed that, by and large, these companies were not major contributors to New Mexico candidates and party committees. However, several were leading contributors within their respective industries.<\/p>\n<h3>Political contributions made by subsidy recipients<\/h3>\n<p>Broadly speaking, these subsidy recipients were not among New Mexico\u2019s top campaign contributors. For example,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.conocophillips.com\/Pages\/default.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ConocoPhillips<\/a>\u00a0gave slightly less than $300,000 during the 14 years analyzed, and was outpaced by 47 other contributors.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.intel.com\/content\/www\/us\/en\/homepage.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Intel<\/a>\u00a0ranks 226th on the list of state-level contributors in New Mexico.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.hp.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hewlett Packard<\/a>, meanwhile, ranks 303rd with $57,280 in donations. In fact, 2012 was the sole year in which any of these donors were among the top 20 state-level donors; ConocoPhillips gave $77,000 that year, the 12th-largest contributor total.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"module align-left half type-aside\">\n<h3>About this article<\/h3>\n<p>This story was produced by\u00a0the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/research\/blog\/a-cold-trail-contributions-and-subsidies-in-new-mexico\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">National Institute on Money in State Politics<\/a>,\u00a0the nation&#8217;s only free, nonpartisan, verifiable archive of contributions to political campaigns in all 50 states.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p>Three of the ten companies gave little or no money, despite collectively receiving $252.9 million in state subsidies.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.schott.com\/english\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Schott AG<\/a>, a producer of industrial glass products, is prohibited from giving campaign contributions because it is headquartered in Germany.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sony.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sony<\/a>\u00a0also cannot make political donations as a Japanese corporation, but its\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sonypictures.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">American entertainment subsidiary<\/a>\u00a0does not shy away from\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/show-me?y=2014,2013,2012,2011,2010,2009,2008,2007,2006,2005,2004,2003,2002,2001,2000&amp;f-core=1&amp;f-fc=2&amp;d-eid=16039#[{1|gro=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">state-level contributions<\/a>, and none have landed in New Mexico since 2000. Another entertainment giant,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.lionsgate.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Lions Gate Entertainment<\/a>, made only one contribution: $1,000 to former Gov. Bill Richardson in his 2006 reelection bid.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Subsidy and state-level contribution totals for the top 10 recipients of state subsidies in New Mexico, 2000-2014<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"row-1 odd\" role=\"row\">\n<th class=\"column-1 sorting_disabled\" colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Companies<\/th>\n<th class=\"column-2 sorting_disabled\" colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Subsidy Total<\/th>\n<th class=\"column-3 sorting_disabled\" colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Contribution Total<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<tfoot>\n<tr class=\"row-12 even\">\n<th class=\"column-1\" colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Total<\/th>\n<th class=\"column-2\" colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">$3,545,908,776<\/th>\n<th class=\"column-3\" colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">$559,437<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tfoot>\n<tbody class=\"row-hover\">\n<tr class=\"row-2 even\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">Intel Corp.<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$2,659,370,233<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$76,650<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-3 odd\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">Forest City Enterprises<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$500,000,000<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$36,100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-4 even\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">Schott AG<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$132,218,712<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-5 odd\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">Lions Gate Entertainment<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$114,657,976<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$1,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-6 even\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">Eclipse Aerospace<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$100,931,363<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$12,250<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-7 odd\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">Hewlett Packard<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$17,825,543<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$57,280<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-8 even\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">Sony<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$6,022,693<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-9 odd\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">ConocoPhillips<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$5,073,933<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$299,950<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-10 even\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">Fidelity Investments<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$5,016,829<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$26,250<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-11 odd\" role=\"row\">\n<td class=\"column-1\">Verizon Communications<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-2\">$4,791,494<\/td>\n<td class=\"column-3\">$49,957<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Important donors nonetheless<\/h3>\n<p>Although not among the major donors, five of New Mexico\u2019s foremost subsidy recipients were some of the most generous contributors within their respective industries. For example, Hewlett Packard led the pack of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/show-me?s=NM&amp;y=2014%2C2013%2C2012%2C2011%2C2010%2C2009%2C2008%2C2007%2C2006%2C2005%2C2004%2C2003%2C2002%2C2001%2C2000&amp;f-core=1&amp;f-fc=2&amp;d-cci=26#[{1|gro=d-eid\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">electronics manufacturing and services<\/a>\u00a0donors in New Mexico from 2000 through 2014. ConocoPhillips was fourth among\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/show-me?s=NM&amp;y=2014%2C2013%2C2012%2C2011%2C2010%2C2009%2C2008%2C2007%2C2006%2C2005%2C2004%2C2003%2C2002%2C2001%2C2000&amp;f-core=1&amp;f-fc=2&amp;d-cci=33#[{1|gro=d-eid\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">oil and gas<\/a>\u00a0donors, and Intel held the same rank among\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/show-me?s=NM&amp;y=2014%2C2013%2C2012%2C2011%2C2010%2C2009%2C2008%2C2007%2C2006%2C2005%2C2004%2C2003%2C2002%2C2001%2C2000&amp;f-core=1&amp;f-fc=2&amp;d-cci=27#[{1|gro=d-eid\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">computer equipment and services<\/a>\u00a0donors. Only four\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/show-me?s=NM&amp;y=2014%2C2013%2C2012%2C2011%2C2010%2C2009%2C2008%2C2007%2C2006%2C2005%2C2004%2C2003%2C2002%2C2001%2C2000&amp;f-core=1&amp;f-fc=2&amp;d-cci=24#[{1|gro=d-eid\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">telecommunications<\/a>\u00a0donors outpaced Verizon Communications. And Forest City Enterprises may not be a prolific\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/show-me?s=NM&amp;y=2014%2C2013%2C2012%2C2011%2C2010%2C2009%2C2008%2C2007%2C2006%2C2005%2C2004%2C2003%2C2002%2C2001%2C2000&amp;f-core=1&amp;f-fc=2&amp;d-cci=51#[{1|gro=d-eid\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">real estate<\/a>\u00a0donor in New Mexico, but one of its subsidiaries,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/entity-details\/?eid=6254298&amp;default=contributor\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Forest City Covington<\/a>, gave the fourth-largest industry total ($209,849).<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Of interest, the political giving of this group is seemingly on the rise, even with the recent enactment of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/Portals\/1\/documents\/legismgt\/limits_candidates.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">contribution limits<\/a>\u00a0in New Mexico. From 2000 through 2010 \u2014 a period in which contributors operated without limits \u2014 these ten companies\u2019 collective total increased by an average of almost $18,000 each election cycle. Beginning in 2011-12, donors were\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sos.state.nm.us\/uploads\/files\/2013NMElectLaws.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">prohibited<\/a>\u00a0from giving more than $5,000 to statewide candidates and political parties, and $2,300 to non-statewide candidates. In that cycle, these subsidy recipients contributed $148,250, their largest total since 2000 and $28,258 more than the previous cycle. The collective total dipped to $52,601 in the 2013-14 cycle, but this was an election without state senate contests and a rather\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cookpolitical.com\/governor\/charts\/race-ratings\/8052\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">uncompetitive gubernatorial race<\/a>. Contribution limits likely did not play a role, as very few donors\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/show-me?s=NM&amp;y=2014%2C2013%2C2012%2C2011%2C2010%2C2009%2C2008%2C2007%2C2006%2C2005%2C2004%2C2003%2C2002%2C2001%2C2000&amp;f-core=1&amp;f-fc=2&amp;d-eid=1325%2C1026%2C599168%2C9045754%2C1233%2C16039%2C668%2C1017%2C2741&amp;y=2014#[{1|gro=c-t-id,d-eid\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reached the new limits<\/a>\u00a0in 2012.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-140454\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/ResizedImage600553-NM-Top10Subsidy-copy.jpg\" alt=\"ResizedImage600553-NM-Top10Subsidy copy\" width=\"600\" height=\"553\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/ResizedImage600553-NM-Top10Subsidy-copy.jpg 600w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/ResizedImage600553-NM-Top10Subsidy-copy-336x310.jpg 336w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<h3>Conclusion<\/h3>\n<p>All told, these subsidy recipients were clearly not the state&#8217;s most prominent campaign donors. Political donations only carried so much weight, given that just one of these subsidy recipients cracked the list of top 50 contributors in New Mexico from 2000 through 2014. Still, it is hard to ignore the prominence of some subsidy recipients within their respective industries, as well as the 2012 spike in contributions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The 10 companies that benefit most from state subsidies in New Mexico have not been major contributors to state candidates and party committees.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":54908,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[705,107],"class_list":["post-140448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-money-in-politics","tag-roundhouse"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140448\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54908"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}