{"id":125891,"date":"2016-02-09T19:52:07","date_gmt":"2016-02-10T02:52:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=125891"},"modified":"2016-02-09T20:29:24","modified_gmt":"2016-02-10T03:29:24","slug":"take-test-based-focus-out-of-state-budget-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/02\/take-test-based-focus-out-of-state-budget-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"Take test-based focus out of state budget bill"},"content":{"rendered":"

COMMENTARY:<\/strong>\u00a0The test-based focus of House Bill 2<\/a>, the \u201cbudget bill,\u201d must be ended.<\/p>\n

\"Betty<\/a>

Courtesy photo<\/p>

Betty Patterson<\/p><\/div>\n

Students are at the center of our existence at the National Education Association \u2013 New Mexico. Student success is best supported when every student has a high-quality professional education team there for them. House Bill 2 (HB2) as sent by the House to the Senate moves our state in the wrong direction.<\/p>\n

A proposed amendment to HB2 moves our state in the right direction by removing $8.5 million that\u00a0funds the destructive and failed \u201cmerit pay\u201d program of the Public Education Department (PED). The amendment converts those funds so they will be spent by districts to pay for a 16 percent increase school employees will otherwise pay themselves for health insurance next year.<\/p>\n

Not a raise, this proposal prevents the downward slide in take-home pay for school employees. New Mexico education employees will lose $8.3 million without this fix. Thankfully, Senator Pete Campos (D-Las Vegas) is bringing this amendment forward.<\/p>\n

Reasonable people may support the theory of pay increases based primarily on the quality of work performed. If we can accurately measure teacher contribution to student success, some say, we should only reward those teachers who achieve highly.<\/p>\n

The reality of how teacher evaluations and \u201cmerit pay\u201d tied to it by the PED does not achieve that goal! The evaluation system used to provide the basis for determining a teacher \u201cmerits\u201d a raise is so seriously flawed the PED is now prohibited by a court for implementing \u201cconsequences\u201d such as the PED and HB2 now proposes. The court may well make permanent that injunction. Regardless, the PED is the only organization in our state proclaiming they have a fair basis for a \u201cmerit\u201d pay system.<\/p>\n

Continuing to deny most educators a raise in favor of rewarding a few based on a flawed system is wrong for the New Mexico students we strive to educate.<\/p>\n

Too much focus on teacher evaluations tied to student scores on standardized tests warps school priorities. Continuing a system based on such tests diminishes our ability to improve student success! Good education inspires students\u2019 natural curiosity, imagination, and desire to learn. Schools that nurture these values today are growing New Mexico\u2019s future inventors, thinkers, artists and leaders.<\/p>\n

Opportunity for all New Mexico students means teacher pay that attracts and helps retain the best people for the job. The same is true for other education professionals here in New Mexico \u2013 none of whom are eligible for the \u201cmerit\u201d pay program.<\/p>\n

Our state economy is in the pits, so a hard-earned pay raise is not likely. Low pay and unfair financial awards to only a few educators are driving quality teachers and other employees away from working with the schools. The Legislature can help cover insurance cost increases. We ask New Mexicans who care first and foremost about our students, as we do, to support this budget amendment.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Patterson is the president of the National Education Association New Mexico<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A proposed amendment to the budget bill moves our state in the right direction by removing $8.5 million that funds the destructive and failed \u201cmerit pay\u201d program of the Public Education Department.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":125913,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1192,16],"tags":[3250,196,234,125,107,288],"class_list":["post-125891","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary","category-guest-columns","tag-2016-legislative-session","tag-budget","tag-children","tag-education","tag-roundhouse","tag-unions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125891","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=125891"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125891\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/125913"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=125891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=125891"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=125891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}