{"id":118795,"date":"2016-01-21T18:32:27","date_gmt":"2016-01-22T01:32:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=118795"},"modified":"2016-01-21T18:32:27","modified_gmt":"2016-01-22T01:32:27","slug":"what-is-political-dark-money-and-is-it-bad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/01\/what-is-political-dark-money-and-is-it-bad\/","title":{"rendered":"What is political &#8216;dark money&#8217; \u2014 and is it bad?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By now, you&#8217;ve probably heard the phrase &#8220;dark money.&#8221; Activists use it. Politicians use it. And journalists use it, including here at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Center for Public Integrity<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_54908\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 336px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/pictures-of-money\/17123251389\/in\/photolist-s6895e-chEwR9-bH1iX8-bt4mNt-42PQoC-a2YSa6-62QVKf-bta55K-dB7F8e-dK2oa7-aFDjPB-aYWk56-aFATbM-aFAaK6-aFAQEv-snzAJp-QxcaH-s4fksR-cMnty-bZvUDS-bta3kH-brd1K2-62LFqP-dTUAhR-5p8w8o-7jm7SP-8F5t1j-dSZe91-dUSc9a-a5SwX-dSK3tm-biaRHp-68vjKV-68zxeQ-9C9vCS-aFAPtx-9ZA9J6-cXNz15-9kJxyv-b6MUJK-68zxij-aFDkRt-aFDet2-bDwJ11-5DfGXv-bmm93i-55FLSR-aFDcrg-bf3Nge-nQZguc\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-54908\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-336x216.jpg\" alt=\"Money\" width=\"336\" height=\"216\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-336x216.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-768x494.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-771x495.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-1170x752.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money-780x500.jpg 780w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/Money.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Pictures of Money \/ Creative Commons<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Cutline goes here. (<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\" target=\"_blank\">photo cc info<\/a>)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>For some people, it&#8217;s just another piece of confusing campaign finance jargon. For others, it&#8217;s a term of art, with a precise definition.<\/p>\n<p>So here are answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about dark money in politics.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What makes political money dark money?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The sources behind most of the money raised by politicians and political groups are publicly disclosed. Candidates, parties and political action committees \u2014 including the super PACs that are allowed to accept unlimited amounts of money \u2014 all report the names of their donors to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fec.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Election Commission<\/a> on a regular basis. Or, to be technical, they regularly disclose the names of all their donors who each give more than $200. But when the source of political money isn&#8217;t known, that&#8217;s dark money.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What does political dark money look like?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The two most common vehicles for dark money in politics are politically active nonprofits and corporate entities such as limited liability companies. Certain politically active nonprofits \u2014 notably those formed under sections 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(6) of the tax code \u2014 are generally not required to publicly disclose their donors. Meanwhile, when limited liability companies are formed in certain states, such as Delaware and Wyoming, they are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2015\/03\/31\/16944\/rapper-backed-group-illustrates-blind-spot-political-transparency\" target=\"_blank\">essentially black boxes<\/a>; the company\u2019s name is basically the only thing known about them. These LLCs can be used to make political expenditures themselves or to donate to super PACs.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"module align-left half type-aside\">\n<h3>About this article<\/h3>\n<p>This story\u00a0is\u00a0from\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">The Center for Public Integrity<\/a>, a nonprofit, nonpartisan investigative media organization in Washington, D.C.\u00a0This story was co-published with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/news\/us-news\/what-dark-money-why-do-so-many-people-think-it-n499731\" target=\"_blank\">NBC News<\/a>. A version of this story also appeared on <a href=\"http:\/\/america.aljazeera.com\/articles\/2016\/1\/20\/how-secret-donations-influence-us-elections.html\" target=\"_blank\">Al Jazeera America<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p><strong>How much money are we talking about?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>During the 2012 election cycle \u2014 the last time the presidency was at stake \u2014 dark money groups pumped about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opensecrets.org\/outsidespending\/summ.php?cycle=2012&amp;chrt=D&amp;disp=O&amp;type=I\" target=\"_blank\">$300 million<\/a> into political messages that called for the election or defeat of federal candidates, according to the nonpartisan <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opensecrets.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Center for Responsive Politics<\/a>. Additionally, dark money groups spent hundreds of millions of dollars on political advertisements that focused more on issues than candidates. The most notable example? <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/koch-backed-political-network-built-to-shield-donors-raised-400-million-in-2012-elections\/2014\/01\/05\/9e7cfd9a-719b-11e3-9389-09ef9944065e_story.html\" target=\"_blank\">Americans for Prosperity<\/a>, the flagship nonprofit of the conservative billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch. Also worth noting: Dark money doesn\u2019t affect every election. It frequently targets the most <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2014\/11\/05\/16218\/dark-money-funded-tv-ads-senate-races\" target=\"_blank\">high-profile political races<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Do Democrats use dark money?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes. Neither party wants to be left behind in the political money arms race. The result: Dark money groups are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2014\/09\/04\/15459\/gop-s-senate-hopes-energized-koch-network-ad-blitz\" target=\"_blank\">multiplying<\/a> \u2014 and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2014\/10\/29\/16088\/flush-mystery-money-kentucky-nonprofit-haunts-grimes-senate-bid\" target=\"_blank\">thriving<\/a> \u2014 on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2014\/09\/03\/15436\/can-dark-money-group-help-democrats-keep-senate\" target=\"_blank\">both ends<\/a> of the political spectrum. However, during the 2012 election cycle, conservative dark money groups that reported expenditures to the FEC outspent liberal ones by about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opensecrets.org\/outsidespending\/summ.php?cycle=2012&amp;chrt=V&amp;disp=O&amp;type=U\" target=\"_blank\">8-to-1<\/a>, according to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opensecrets.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Center for Responsive Politics<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How does dark money relate to the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s <em>Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission\u00a0<\/em>ruling?<\/strong><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2012\/10\/18\/11527\/citizens-united-decision-and-why-it-matters\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Citizens United<\/em> decision<\/a> gave the green light to corporations, including certain types of nonprofit corporations, to spend money on political ads that expressly called for the election or defeat of federal candidates. A prior U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2007, known as <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2006\/06-969\" target=\"_blank\">Wisconsin Right to Life v. FEC<\/a><\/em>, had allowed corporations, including certain types of nonprofits, to spend money on issue ads during the run-up to elections \u2014 so long as they did not overtly call for the election or defeat of candidates. The <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act\" target=\"_blank\">Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002<\/a> had banned both types of corporate spending in politics. Now that these restrictions have been overturned, politically active nonprofit groups are spending more money than ever to directly influence elections.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Are there other types of money in politics that come from unknown sources?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The names of small-dollar donors who give $200 or less are not publicly disclosed. Some conservative activists and politicians <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2015\/12\/10\/18951\/campaign-finance-reform-measure-solution-search-problem\" target=\"_blank\">have worried<\/a> that foreigners, or other illicit donors, might try to exploit this disclosure rule to their advantage. But most election observers can\u2019t point to any evidence of widespread abuse.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Why are so many people upset about dark money in politics?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Campaign finance reform activists argue that voters should know who is funding political advertisements. Such information, they assert, is essential to voters\u2019 ability to evaluate the merits of political messages \u2014 and to know if certain special interests may be trying to curry favor with politicians. Fred Wertheimer, the founder and president of Democracy 21, for one, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.reuters.com\/great-debate\/2015\/01\/16\/democracy-is-drowning-in-a-sea-of-dark-money\/\" target=\"_blank\">has said<\/a>\u00a0that \u201chistory makes clear that unlimited contributions and secret money are a formula for corruption.\u201d Likewise, the Campaign Legal Center <a href=\"http:\/\/www.campaignlegalcenter.org\/news\/blog\/why-our-democracy-needs-disclosure\" target=\"_blank\">has called<\/a> the emergence of dark money a \u201cserious threat to our democracy.\u201d In a portion of the controversial <em>Citizens United<\/em> decision, eight of the nine Supreme Court justices <a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/558\/08-205\/opinion.html\" target=\"_blank\">agreed<\/a> that disclosure of money in politics was important because \u201ctransparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who thinks dark money in politics is good?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Supporters of anonymity in politics frequently <a href=\"http:\/\/www.campaignfreedom.org\/2014\/01\/10\/protecting-anonymous-speech-used-to-be-common-sense\/\" target=\"_blank\">note<\/a> that\u00a0<em>The Federalist Papers<\/em> and Thomas Paine\u2019s <em>Common Sense\u00a0<\/em>were published anonymously during the country\u2019s founding. Lawyers at the <a href=\"http:\/\/wyliberty.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Wyoming Liberty Group<\/a>, for instance, have <a href=\"http:\/\/wyliberty.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/LB018-Anonymity.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">argued<\/a> that throughout American history, \u201canonymous political speech has been the scorn of entrenched powers and the saving balm of emerging voices.\u201d Meanwhile, officials at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.campaignfreedom.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Center for Competitive Politics<\/a> have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.campaignfreedom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/2015-07-08_Two-Pager_Nese_Five-Misconceptions-About-Dark-Money.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">argued<\/a> that dark money is a \u201cpejorative term\u201d and that its threat is \u201coverblown.\u201d The Center for Competitive Politics has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.campaignfreedom.org\/external-relations\/disclosure\/\" target=\"_blank\">further argued<\/a> that \u201cdisclosure comes with a cost,\u201d including the potential to chill speech and for donors to be harassed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who regulates political dark money?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The nation\u2019s primary regulator of money in politics is the six-member FEC. However, the FEC\u2019s three Republican commissioners and three Democratic ones <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2013\/12\/17\/13996\/how-washington-starves-its-election-watchdog\" target=\"_blank\">have significant ideological disagreements<\/a> about the degree to which dark money is a problem. Meanwhile, the Internal Revenue Service <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2014\/07\/15\/15035\/hobbled-irs-cant-stem-dark-money-flow\" target=\"_blank\">regulates nonprofit organizations<\/a> and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2014\/06\/19\/14974\/irs-says-liberal-group-too-political-social-welfare-status\" target=\"_blank\">can revoke<\/a> a nonprofit\u2019s tax-exempt status if a group is deemed to not deserve it. But in recent years, only a handful of 501(c)(4) nonprofits \u2014 which have the primary purpose of promoting \u201csocial welfare\u201d \u2014 have had their tax-exempt status revoked because the Internal Revenue Service deemed them to be too political. The Department of Justice can also criminally prosecute \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/cfr\/text\/11\/111.24\" target=\"_blank\">knowing and willful<\/a>\u201d violations of campaign finance law, although this, too, is rare.<\/p>\n<p><strong>So, is there really no way to know who&#8217;s behind political dark money?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Over the years, journalists have developed a number of backdoor approaches to follow the money flowing to dark money organizations. But oftentimes, these approaches only yield results long after a dark money spending spree is over.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What are these backdoors?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sometimes dark money groups <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2013\/07\/02\/12926\/gop-leadership-pacs-boost-american-future-fund\" target=\"_blank\">receive money<\/a> from other political groups that must disclose their expenditures to either state or federal campaign finance regulators. Other times, dark money groups <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2013\/12\/23\/14054\/nonpartisan-gun-rights-group-boosted-democratic-aligned-america-votes\" target=\"_blank\">receive<\/a> substantial\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2015\/11\/17\/18865\/new-tax-documents-show-crossroads-gps-poured-millions-2014-senate-race\" target=\"_blank\">amounts of money<\/a> from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2012\/11\/29\/11862\/drug-lobby-gave-750000-pro-hatch-nonprofit-utahs-us-senate-race\" target=\"_blank\">other nonprofits<\/a> that must report doling out these grants on their own annual tax filings with the IRS. Similarly, some dark money groups receive money <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2015\/01\/13\/16576\/liberal-dark-money-group-could-face-irs-fine\" target=\"_blank\">from labor unions<\/a>, which must report those expenditures on annual reports filed with the Department of Labor. And on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2014\/01\/16\/14109\/dow-chemical-backed-anti-union-nonprofit-2-million-donation\" target=\"_blank\">rare occasions<\/a>, corporations <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2013\/05\/30\/12740\/tobacco-giant-funded-conservative-nonprofits\" target=\"_blank\">voluntarily disclose<\/a> their <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/2014\/01\/16\/14107\/top-us-corporations-funneled-173-million-political-nonprofits\" target=\"_blank\">contributions to politically active nonprofits<\/a>. If an individual donates to a dark money group, there is essentially no public paper trail to follow.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Secret cash is influencing elections in the United States. Here\u2019s how.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":54908,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[705,116],"class_list":["post-118795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-money-in-politics","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118795"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118795\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54908"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}