{"id":114277,"date":"2016-01-05T13:44:18","date_gmt":"2016-01-05T20:44:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=114277"},"modified":"2016-02-03T21:40:49","modified_gmt":"2016-02-04T04:40:49","slug":"what-you-need-to-know-about-nms-newest-fight-over-drivers-licenses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2016\/01\/what-you-need-to-know-about-nms-newest-fight-over-drivers-licenses\/","title":{"rendered":"What you need to know about NM&#8217;s newest fight over driver&#8217;s licenses"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_56542\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignnone\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-56542\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-771x504.jpg\" alt=\"A statue outside the Roundhouse in Santa Fe.\" width=\"771\" height=\"504\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-771x504.jpg 771w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-336x220.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-768x502.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse-1170x764.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Kids-at-Roundhouse.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Heath Haussamen \/ NMPolitics.net<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">A statue outside the Roundhouse in Santa Fe.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Federal officials have set a Sunday deadline for state political leaders to agree to a compromise that brings New Mexico\u00a0driver&#8217;s licenses into compliance with the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dhs.gov\/real-id-public-faqs\" target=\"_blank\">REAL ID Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"module align-right half type-aside\">\n<h3>Update, Jan. 7, 2:15 p.m.<\/h3>\n<p>This article originally reported that if state political leaders didn&#8217;t agree to a compromise by Sunday,\u00a0New Mexico licenses would not\u00a0get people into nuclear power plants, military bases, and other federal facilities that require identification. That&#8217;s apparently not accurate. What&#8217;s accurate is that New Mexico licenses may or may not get people into federal facilities if the state&#8217;s licenses are\u00a0deemed not complaint with REAL ID.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of confusion on this point. News organizations have reported conflicting information. As of Thursday, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security still states on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dhs.gov\/real-id-and-you-rumor-control\" target=\"_blank\">its website<\/a> that &#8220;Residents from a noncompliant state without extensions will need to show an alternative form of ID when visiting federal facilities, nuclear power plants and military bases.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But that&#8217;s not accurate\u00a0&#8212;\u00a0and, in a state with several military installations and national laboratories, this point matters. Some facilities &#8212; including military bases &#8212; are\u00a0setting their own rules. At least some plan to continue accepting New Mexico driver&#8217;s licenses as valid forms of ID regardless of REAL ID compliance, at least for now.<\/p>\n<p>For example, White Sands Missile Range\u00a0plans\u00a0continue to accept New Mexico licenses to get visitors on base, even if they&#8217;re deemed out of compliance with the REAL ID Act, because the facility also conducts background checks on all visitors, Erin Dorrance, WSMR spokeswoman, said\u00a0Thursday. Dorrance\u00a0cautioned that the decision to accept New Mexico licenses, which comes from the U.S. Army, could change.<\/p>\n<p>There doesn&#8217;t appear to be a comprehensive list indicating which\u00a0federal facilities\u00a0plan to\u00a0continue to accept New Mexico licenses if they&#8217;re not REAL ID compliant and which plan to\u00a0require alternate forms of ID, such as passports.<\/p>\n<p>This article has been updated to include accurate information.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p>That has given new life to <a href=\"http:\/\/nmindepth.com\/2013\/01\/08\/immigration-safety-at-issue-in-license-debate\/\" target=\"_blank\">the annual battle<\/a> in the N.M. Legislature over repealing the state&#8217;s 2003 law that allows immigrants without legal status to obtain licenses &#8212; which is the primary reason New Mexico&#8217;s licenses don&#8217;t currently comply with REAL ID.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what you need to know about the issue:<\/p>\n<h3>The REAL ID Act<\/h3>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/REAL_ID_Act\" target=\"_blank\">REAL ID Act<\/a>, passed by Congress in 2005, lets the federal government set security standards for IDs that can\u00a0be\u00a0used for federal purposes such as boarding airplanes and entering\u00a0military bases. Many\u00a0states have come into compliance with REAL ID. The feds have granted waivers to New Mexico and other states in the past, but this year have decided\u00a0to enforce the act in some states, including here.<\/p>\n<p>No matter what happens, you&#8217;ll still be able to use your New Mexico license to board a plane, at least for now. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) isn&#8217;t currently requiring REAL ID compliance at airports,\u00a0Philip A. McNamara, DHS assistant secretary For Intergovernmental Affairs, wrote in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.abqjournal.com\/679095\/opinion\/what-you-need-to-know-about-effects-of-real-id-act.html\" target=\"_blank\">a column<\/a> published in the Albuquerque Journal in November.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Right now, no one needs to adjust travel plans, rush out to get a new driver\u2019s license or a passport for domestic air travel. And when you do, we will make sure you have plenty of notice,&#8221; McNamara\u00a0wrote. He promised\u00a0a warning &#8220;at least 120 days&#8221; before\u00a0the feds decide to enforce REAL ID at airports.<\/p>\n<p>What will change in New Mexico starting Sunday\u00a0if state political leaders don&#8217;t\u00a0agree to a compromise before then? New Mexico licenses may or may not\u00a0get people into nuclear power plants, military bases, and other federal facilities that require identification. New Mexicans may\u00a0need to show an alternative form of ID such as a passport.<\/p>\n<p>Some facilities, such as military bases, are setting their own rules for what will be needed to get on base if New Mexico licenses are deemed out of compliance with REAL ID.<\/p>\n<h3>What can NM political leaders do?<\/h3>\n<p>New Mexico&#8217;s lawmakers meet in a 30-day session that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmlegis.gov\/lcs\/lcsdocs\/sessionsdates.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">begins Jan. 19<\/a>. They could amend state law to make\u00a0New Mexico&#8217;s licenses REAL ID compliant. Gov. Susana Martinez has agreed to put the topic on the agenda.<\/p>\n<p>But the federal deadline comes nine days earlier. The feds have agreed to give New Mexico <a href=\"http:\/\/www.heinrich.senate.gov\/press-releases\/udall-heinrich-lujn-and-lujan-grisham-secure-pledge-from-dhs-that-nm-can-get-delay-of-real-id-enforcement-if-governor-and-legislature-agree-on-real-id-fix\" target=\"_blank\">a 12-month extension<\/a> if Martinez and legislative leaders send DHS a letter pledging\u00a0agreement on legislation that ensures REAL ID compliance.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no compromise\u00a0yet. Various proposals would create\u00a0two distinctly different cards that allow people in New Mexico to drive legally &#8212; one that is REAL ID complaint and another for people who don&#8217;t provide Social Security numbers or other proof of lawful residence.<\/p>\n<h3>The Democrats&#8217; proposal<\/h3>\n<p>Many Democrats favor shifting to a\u00a0two-tier licensure system so most people &#8212; those who provide proof of legal residence or citizenship &#8212; can obtain licenses that will be accepted for federal purposes, and those who don&#8217;t can still obtain\u00a0a second-tier license\u00a0letting them drive legally in New Mexico.<\/p>\n<p>Three Democratic legislative leaders &#8212; Senate President Pro Tem Mary Kay Papen, Senate Majority Leader Michael Sanchez, and House Minority Leader Brian Egolf &#8212; sent <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/DemsREALIDLetter.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">a letter<\/a> to Martinez and House Speaker Don Tripp, a Republican, on Monday\u00a0urging compromise. They cited <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmlegis.gov\/lcs\/legislation.aspx?chamber=S&amp;legtype=B&amp;legno=%20653&amp;year=15\" target=\"_blank\">a bill<\/a> that passed the Senate in 2015 that would have created a two-tier licensure system.<\/p>\n<p>Under that\u00a0bill, those who don&#8217;t provide proof of citizenship or legal residence would have to provide &#8220;an individual tax identification number, a passport or ID from the individual\u2019s country of origin, or other documentation that the secretary of (the state&#8217;s Taxation and Revenue Department)\u00a0has authorized as an acceptable substitute&#8221; to obtain a second-tier license. The impact of those requirements on people without legal status who already have New Mexico licenses isn&#8217;t clear &#8212; but they could result in some people without legal status who currently have licenses losing them.<\/p>\n<h3>The Republicans&#8217; proposal<\/h3>\n<p>Republicans have proposed even stricter requirements that would likely strip some current license holders of their ability to drive legally. Tripp sent <a href=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/2016.01.04-Letter-to-Michael-Sanchez-on-REAL-ID-legislation-and-extens....pdf\" target=\"_blank\">his own\u00a0letter<\/a> to\u00a0Sanchez\u00a0on Tuesday laying out the GOP proposal. The main difference is that people would have to show evidence that they have lived in New Mexico for at least two years and filed personal income taxes with the state in the previous year to obtain\u00a0the second-tier license.<\/p>\n<p>Tripp cited Utah as among the states that have such a system in place. But <a href=\"http:\/\/dld.utah.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/17\/2015\/01\/DLD-335.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Utah&#8217;s requirements<\/a> for those without legal status to obtain a so-called driving privilege card don&#8217;t include proof of two years of residency or having filed a tax return.<\/p>\n<h3>What now?<\/h3>\n<p>State legislative leaders and the governor have until Sunday to resolve their dispute and send a letter to DHS stating that they&#8217;ve agreed to a REAL ID compliant solution, or DHS has said it won&#8217;t grant another one-year extension.<\/p>\n<p>If the political leaders come to an agreement, they&#8217;ll have to pass a\u00a0bill through the Legislature. Then the state would have approximately 11-12\u00a0months to implement the new system before the REAL ID compliance extension would expire.<\/p>\n<p>If political leaders don&#8217;t come to an agreement, and DHS makes good on its promise to not grant another REAL ID extension, New Mexicans may\u00a0need to show an alternative form of ID to get\u00a0into some federal facilities that require identification starting next week.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Federal officials have set a Sunday deadline for state political leaders to agree to a compromise that brings New Mexico driver&#8217;s licenses into compliance with the REAL ID Act.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":56542,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[3250,140,270,107,116],"class_list":["post-114277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-2016-legislative-session","tag-border-and-immigration","tag-drivers-licenses","tag-roundhouse","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114277\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/56542"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}