{"id":106103,"date":"2015-12-04T07:27:47","date_gmt":"2015-12-04T14:27:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/?p=106103"},"modified":"2015-12-04T13:30:11","modified_gmt":"2015-12-04T20:30:11","slug":"so-called-fix-bill-is-a-thinly-veiled-attempt-to-kill-conservation-fund","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/2015\/12\/so-called-fix-bill-is-a-thinly-veiled-attempt-to-kill-conservation-fund\/","title":{"rendered":"So-called &#8216;fix&#8217; bill is a thinly veiled attempt to kill conservation fund"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>COMMENTARY:<\/strong> Some dictionaries define chutzpah as shameless audacity or impudence.<\/p>\n<p>Near that definition in every dictionary should be a photo of U.S. Rep.\u00a0Rob Bishop of Utah.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_106107\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 336px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-106107\" src=\"http:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Merlino-Alexandra-336x249.jpg\" alt=\"Alexandra Merlino\" width=\"336\" height=\"249\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Merlino-Alexandra-336x249.jpg 336w, https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Merlino-Alexandra.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Courtesy photo<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Alexandra Merlino<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Bishop recently was instrumental in allowing the effective Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) to expire in September, despite wide bipartisan support for the program.<\/p>\n<p>Now, just a few weeks ago, Bishop introduced a Land and Water Conservation bill he has branded as a \u201cfix\u201d to the venerable conservation program that had invested $300 million in over 1,000 New Mexico parks projects over 50 years.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, Bishop\u2019s \u201cfix\u201d is merely a thinly veiled attempt to finally kill LWCF once and for all.<\/p>\n<p>Why Bishop\u2019s bill is a bad deal for public lands and for New Mexico? It would effectively eviscerate the fund&#8217;s use for establishing shared public outdoor places and protecting increasingly precious water resources in the American West, allowing only half of one percent of the fund to be used for this purpose. The ability of the fund to set aside and protect public lands in the West was a cornerstone\u2019s of the LWCF\u2019s success and the sustainable growth of the Western economy over the past 50 years. This proposal by Rep. Bishop would be laughable if it wasn\u2019t so insulting.<\/p>\n<p>Also, Bishop\u2019s \u201cLWCF rewrite\u201d diverts LWCF funds that currently go to parks, trails, and recreation facilities to promote offshore energy exploration, which has nothing to do with the original intent of LWCF.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Finally, this bad bill diverts other LWCF funds that should go to land and water conservation efforts to unrelated projects, such as the Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program. PILT is important because it helps fund rural governments, but stealing from LWCF to fund it does a grave disservice to both of these important programs.<\/p>\n<p>Clearly, Bishop\u2019s bill is disastrous for anyone who values public lands, outdoor recreation, and passing along an outdoor heritage to future generations of New Mexico.<\/p>\n<p>LWCF was established in 1965 and has been funded from royalties derived from off-shore drilling. In New Mexico it not only funded local parks and ball fields in every single county, it also helped preserve iconic New Mexico spots such as the Valles Caldera, Chaco Canyon, El Camino Real, Tent Rocks and parts of the Organ Mountains. These are places generations of American families enjoy because they are protected.<\/p>\n<p>As a pro-business group, we recognize the raw economic value of protecting these public lands. In New Mexico, we understand the value of the outdoor economy, which supports 68,000 direct jobs and is responsible for $6.1 billion annually in economic impact. We know protected public lands mean lots of green for many New Mexico businesses.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s part of what makes the expiration of LWCF such a tragedy. It\u2019s what also makes Rob Bishop\u2019s LWCF \u201cfix\u201d bill such a cruel joke played on every New Mexican who uses our public lands to recreate or make a living.<\/p>\n<p>Thankfully our U.S. Sens.\u00a0Udall and Heinrich and Reps.\u00a0Luj\u00e1n and Lujan-Grisham have apparently seen through Rob Bishop\u2019s cynical attempt to pull the wool over our eyes.<\/p>\n<p>They get that Rob Bishop does not share our values. He doesn\u2019t seem to understand that we support protected public lands and view them as an asset. Bishop\u2019s chutzpah is an affront to any New Mexican who has enjoyed our public lands, hunted, fished or even just played ball in a city park built with LWCF funds. Guess what? That\u2019s most of us.<\/p>\n<p>And now, because of the machinations of a Utah congressman with an ax to grind, all New Mexicans who enjoy our lands or make a living in the outdoor economy could suffer. We all have an interest in reinstating the LWCF. We must now let our voices be heard and oppose Bishop\u2019s terrible bill.<\/p>\n<p><em>Merlino, of Santa Fe, is executive director of the <a href=\"http:\/\/prbnewmexico.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">New Mexico Partnership for Responsible Business<\/a>. This commentary has been updated to clarify that Bishop&#8217;s bill would allow\u00a0half of one percent of the fund to be used<em>\u00a0for establishing shared public outdoor places and protecting increasingly precious water resources in the American West.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop&#8217;s bill would effectively eviscerate use of the Land and Water Conservation Fund for establishing shared public outdoor places and protecting increasingly precious water resources in the American West.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":106107,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1192,16],"tags":[147,116],"class_list":["post-106103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary","category-guest-columns","tag-environment","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=106103"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106103\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/106107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=106103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=106103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nmpolitics.net\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=106103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}