Federal examples of e-mail as a legal form of writing
|
Since state Rep. Joseph Cervantes told me last week he believes federal law does state that e-mails are legal forms of writing, I’ve come across a few examples that seem to back him up. Cervantes’ comments came in the context of me writing about New Mexico State University’s assertion that e-mail is generally not a valid way to request documents under the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act, which states that requests, to trigger the requirements in the act, must be written. My frustration with that assertion by NMSU is part of a larger complaint I have with the university’s skirting of government transparency laws, which you can read about by clicking here. Cervantes, an attorney who has worked closely with government transparency laws in his legislative role, disagreed with NMSU last week, telling me “there’s lots of federal law that says it is a writing.” I’ve come across some examples. The federal Rules of Evidence state that “‘writings’ and ‘recordings’ consist of letters, words or numbers, or their equivalent, set down by handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photography, magnetic impulse, mechanical or electronic recording, or other form of data compilation.” Surely, that includes e-mails. Continue Reading