I recently had a politico tell me that politics is about fear, that most of our leaders make decisions based primarily on the consequences they’ll face.
For that reason, many of our elected officials like to pass the buck.
I’ve been a journalist for eight years, and there have been many times politicians have tried to pass it off on me. In the current battle over speaker of the House, for example, several Democratic members have tried to do that in recent days.
“You know Ben Lujan is corrupt,” one told me. “Call for House members to vote against him. Tell them it’s the right thing to do.”
So I asked how that member planned to vote. That depends, I was told. If it’s safe to do so, that member pledged to vote against Lujan, but if it isn’t, all bets are off.
Another member told me the press, not legislators, will determine who becomes the next speaker.
I don’t have a vote. Neither does any other member of the press. But I do have a role in this process, so I’ll share with you some of what I’ve learned about Lujan.
• He slipped $75 million into the capital outlay bill earlier this year to fund water-rights lawsuit settlements. He did it without the knowledge of just about every lawmaker, at the last minute, and outside the normal process. Because of that, the governor appropriately vetoed it.
• A Lujan staffer has been living rent-free in a home owned by the Region III Housing Authority, which was run, until recently, by Lujan’s close friend Vincent “Smiley” Gallegos, a lobbyist who has spent a lot of time in the speaker’s office.
• Lujan opposed impeachment hearings for former state Treasurer Robert Vigil and, when he lost that fight, he tried, unsuccessfully, to close the hearings to the public. If ever there was a time for the House to take seriously its constitutional responsibility to impeach, and to do it with transparency, this was it.
• There is widespread feeling among House Democrats that Lujan is unethical, that he repeatedly disregards House rules and checks on his power, and that he controls with an iron fist. He inspires fear, and that’s probably his intention.
Beyond that, I can tell you that about a dozen House Democrats have shared with me their concerns about Lujan. Fewer than half of those say they’ll vote for Ken Martinez to become speaker, however, because they are afraid.
That’s when they ask me to do something.
I’m doing what I can. I’m reporting on the issue. I have a couple of records requests out as I look into allegations that have been shared with me. I’m digging – not looking with the motive of ousting Lujan, but with the intent of seeking the truth, whatever it may be.
That’s my job – to sort through rumor and report fact, to facilitate a discussion that helps the community find the truth.
Legislators have a duty to the truth. They have a duty to the public to vote based on what they believe is right.
“If I do that and Lujan wins, I’ll lose my committee position, and I won’t get much capital outlay,” one representative told me. “The people of my district will suffer because they won’t get new infrastructure they need.”
I think that’s an excuse for a politico who is really thinking about his own political future.
It’s also shortsighted. It’s saying that you don’t have the guts to stand up for what’s right, so at least if you play along you’ll be able to give your constituents some paved roads. There’s no integrity in that.
The long-term solution to
If we did that, capital outlay funds could no longer be used as weapons by those in power, and legislators wouldn’t have to worry about whether they would be fairly appropriated.
There would be one less reason to fear. If politics is about fear, it’s because our politicians allow it to be.
I’m not going to say Lujan is dirty. I have no proof, though I do believe his actions with the $75 million appropriation were egregious, and his opposition to impeachment hearings was questionable.
I do know that a number of House Democrats believe he is unethical, at best. I also know that many who believe that are seriously considering voting for him because they fear him. Few who have been willing to tell me they support Lujan have any praise for him.
Our legislators can’t serve two masters. Either they serve the speaker of the House or they serve their constituents and the State of
If legislators believe Lujan is ethical and makes decisions based on what’s best for the citizens of the state, that’s a valid reason to vote for him. But after speaking with many House Democrats I suspect that, were they all to vote their consciences,
Thus far, Rep. Joni Gutierrez of
The rest of our legislators would do well to follow the examples of both and embrace their ethical duty to do the right thing – whatever they believe it to be.