Grand jury directed investment board to produce records related to dealings with Aldus Equity, Chairman Bruce Malott’s e-mails
This article has been updated.
The New Mexico Educational Retirement Board (ERB) reversed courses this afternoon and released two subpoenas it has received from a federal grand jury that is probing state investment deals.
The reversal comes because “additional information relevant to the release of the requested subpoenas” has become available since the ERB denied requests from me and others for the release of the records last month, ERB General Counsel Christopher Schatzman wrote in a letter sent this afternoon. He did not elaborate, and wrote that he reserves the right to withhold documents under similar circumstances in the future.
Read the subpoenas by clicking here and here.
The release of the subpoenas comes a day before the ERB’s governing board was scheduled to decide whether to override the decision by staff to withhold the subpoenas.
“I am proud of our superb ERB staff for reconsidering their position on the subpoenas,” the chairman of the board, Bruce Malott, said this afternoon. “Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and I continue to believe the public’s right to see their government at work should never be marginalized.”
The first subpoena, dated April 28 of this year, directed the ERB to produce a number of records to the grand jury on June 9 in Albuquerque. The request sought documentation from 2003 to the present related to contracts and other agreements the ERB has with companies providing it with investment advice, including information about third-party marketers.
It specifically instructed the ERB to produce records related to the hiring of Aldus Equity — a firm the ERB and State Investment Council (SIC) have both since fired because of its involvement in the pension scandal in New York — and any correspondence between the ERB and Aldus.
The second subpoena, dated May 7, ordered the ERB to produce “all e-mails, including attachments, to or from Bruce Malott for the period January 1, 2003 through the present,” to the grand jury on June 9.
Malott sought release of subpoenas
It was Malott who, earlier this month, wrote a letter to Schatzman stating that he wanted the agency to reconsider its decision to withhold release of two federal grand jury subpoenas it has received. That letter stated that Malott wanted to discuss the issue during an upcoming board meeting if Schatzman was unwilling to reconsider.
It was also Malott who had planned for the board to discuss the issue on Friday.
“I was very well aware that the second subpoena requested my ERB e-mails before I requested ERB staff to reconsider their position,” Malott said this afternoon, “and, from the beginning, I thought (the subpoenas and e-mails) should be disclosed.”
Malott declined to comment on whether he’s a target of the investigation.
Other subpoenas
Late last month, the ERB and SIC both denied requests from me and others for copies of subpoenas from the U.S. Attorney’s Office related to investments. In denying my request, Schatzman cited the exemption to the state’s Inspection of Public Records Act that allows for denial “as otherwise provided by law,” and wrote in his letter that the federal public records law in some instances exempts records compiled for law enforcement purposes.
While New Mexico courts have not addressed whether that federal exemption applies to state law, some other states’ courts have said it does apply there, according to Schatzman’s letter. The SIC’s letter, from Public Information Officer Charles Wollmann, says essentially the same thing.
The responses from the ERB and SIC are different from those I received recently from two other state agencies that have been subpoenaed in federal investigations. The governor’s office has released the subpoena it has received in the federal probe of allegations of pay to play in the Richardson administration.
Meanwhile, the New Mexico Finance Authority (NMFA) has denied my request for the subpoena it received in the pay to play probe. My business, Haussamen Publications, which publishes this site, has sued the NMFA to try to force the release of that subpoena. The lawsuit is pending.
Update, 4:55 p.m.
SIC spokesman Charles Wollmann declined to comment on whether his agency might also reverse courses and release subpoenas it has received.